These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31432077)

  • 61. The pepATTRACT web server for blind, large-scale peptide-protein docking.
    de Vries SJ; Rey J; Schindler CEM; Zacharias M; Tuffery P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jul; 45(W1):W361-W364. PubMed ID: 28460116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. TAIGET: A small-molecule target identification and annotation web server.
    Wei X; Yang J; Li S; Li B; Chen M; Lu Y; Wu X; Cheng Z; Zhang X; Chen Z; Wang C; Wang E; Zheng R; Xu X; Shang H
    Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():898519. PubMed ID: 36105222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?
    Ramírez D; Caballero J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 27104528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark.
    Gaillard T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 29989806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Score_set: a CAPRI benchmark for scoring protein complexes.
    Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2014 Nov; 82(11):3163-9. PubMed ID: 25179222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Consensus combining outcomes of multiple ensemble dockings: examples using dDAT crystalized complexes.
    Triches F; Triches F; Lino de Oliveira C
    MethodsX; 2022; 9():101788. PubMed ID: 35935527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. LightDock: a new multi-scale approach to protein-protein docking.
    Jiménez-García B; Roel-Touris J; Romero-Durana M; Vidal M; Jiménez-González D; Fernández-Recio J
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 34(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 28968719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Challenging Reverse Screening: A Benchmark Study for Comprehensive Evaluation.
    Li M; Hu J; Wang Y; Li Y; Zhang L; Liu Z
    Mol Inform; 2022 Apr; 41(4):e2100063. PubMed ID: 34787366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Rational Drug Discovery of HCV Helicase Inhibitor: Improved Docking Accuracy with Multiple Seeding in AutoDock Vina and In Situ Minimization.
    Lim SK; Othman R; Yusof R; Heh CH
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2017; 13(2):160-169. PubMed ID: 27903217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
    Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. ProSelection: A Novel Algorithm to Select Proper Protein Structure Subsets for in Silico Target Identification and Drug Discovery Research.
    Wang N; Wang L; Xie XQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Nov; 57(11):2686-2698. PubMed ID: 29016123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The Development of Target-Specific Machine Learning Models as Scoring Functions for Docking-Based Target Prediction.
    Nogueira MS; Koch O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1238-1252. PubMed ID: 30802041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. An accurate metalloprotein-specific scoring function and molecular docking program devised by a dynamic sampling and iteration optimization strategy.
    Bai F; Liao S; Gu J; Jiang H; Wang X; Li H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):833-47. PubMed ID: 25746437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Galaxy7TM: flexible GPCR-ligand docking by structure refinement.
    Lee GR; Seok C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(W1):W502-6. PubMed ID: 27131365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking.
    Plewczynski D; Philips A; Von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 21091053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.