These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31433039)
1. Comparative analysis of the NAL-NL2 and DSL v5.0a prescription procedures in the adaptation of hearing aids in the elderly. Bertozzo MC; Blasca WQ Codas; 2019 Aug; 31(4):e20180171. PubMed ID: 31433039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility. Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users. Portelli D; Loteta S; Ciodaro F; Salvago P; Galletti C; Freni L; Alberti G Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3227-3235. PubMed ID: 38546852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss. Johnson EE J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. Johnson EE; Dillon H J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness. Ching TY; Johnson EE; Hou S; Dillon H; Zhang V; Burns L; van Buynder P; Wong A; Flynn C Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52 Suppl 2(0 2):S29-38. PubMed ID: 24350692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss. Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS. Johnson EE Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):143-70. PubMed ID: 24253361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss]. Engler M; Digeser F; Hoppe U HNO; 2022 Jul; 70(7):520-532. PubMed ID: 35061063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners. Digeser FM; Engler M; Hoppe U Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 31809219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods. Moore BC; Sęk A Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of real-ear insertion gains in Japanese-speaking individuals wearing hearing aids with DSLv5 and NAL-NL2. Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Ogiwara A; Nakagawa T; Inoue R; Umehara S; Hara Y; Suzuki K; Yamashita T Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Feb; 48(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 32747167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets. Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities. Ching TYC; Zhang VW; Johnson EE; Van Buynder P; Hou S; Burns L; Button L; Flynn C; McGhie K Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S41-S54. PubMed ID: 28971727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss. Pittman AL; Stewart EC Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231177509. PubMed ID: 37254534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures. Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of hearing aid fitting according to the national acoustic laboratories' prescription for non-linear hearing aids and the desired sensation level methods in Japanese speakers: a crossover-controlled trial. Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Nitta Y; Umehara S; Hara Y; Yamashita T Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Oct; 50(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 36792399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimising hearing aid output to paediatric prescriptive targets improves outcomes in children. Amri NA; Quar TK; Chong FY; Bagatto M Int J Audiol; 2022 Nov; 61(11):924-931. PubMed ID: 34859745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children. Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]