These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31433110)
1. Correcting for Phylogenetic Autocorrelation in Species Sensitivity Distributions. Moore DR; Priest CD; Galic N; Brain RA; Rodney SI Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Jan; 16(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 31433110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions. Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2021-2027. PubMed ID: 35502940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models. Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which distribution to choose for deriving a species sensitivity distribution? Implications from analysis of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data. Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Jun; 278():116379. PubMed ID: 38714082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deriving a water quality guideline for protection of aquatic communities exposed to triclosan in the Canadian environment. Hill KL; Breton RL; Manning GE; Teed RS; Capdevielle M; Slezak B Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jul; 14(4):437-441. PubMed ID: 29528192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Illustrating a Species Sensitivity Distribution for Nano- and Microplastic Particles Using Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling. Takeshita KM; Iwasaki Y; Sinclair TM; Hayashi TI; Naito W Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Apr; 41(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 35226391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantages of model averaging of species sensitivity distributions used for regulating produced water discharges. Binet MT; Golding LA; Adams MS; Robertson T; Elsdon TS Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Mar; 20(2):498-517. PubMed ID: 37466036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterizing Freshwater Ecotoxicity of More Than 9000 Chemicals by Combining Different Levels of Available Measured Test Data with In Silico Predictions. Douziech M; Oginah SA; Golsteijn L; Hauschild MZ; Jolliet O; Owsianiak M; Posthuma L; Fantke P Environ Toxicol Chem; 2024 Aug; 43(8):1914-1927. PubMed ID: 38860654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian and time-independent species sensitivity distributions for risk assessment of chemicals. Grist EP; O'Hagan A; Crane M; Sorokin N; Sims I; Whitehouse P Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 16433377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Life-cycle studies with 2 marine species and bisphenol A: The mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) and sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus). Mihaich E; Staples C; Ortego L; Klečka G; Woelz J; Dimond S; Hentges S Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Feb; 37(2):398-410. PubMed ID: 28834561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures. Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exposure pattern-specific species sensitivity distributions for the ecological risk assessments of insecticides. Van den Brink PJ; Buijert-de Gelder DM; Brock TCM; Roessink I; Focks A Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Sep; 180():252-258. PubMed ID: 31096128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability in the dynamics of mortality and immobility responses of freshwater arthropods exposed to chlorpyrifos. Rubach MN; Crum SJ; Van den Brink PJ Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 May; 60(4):708-21. PubMed ID: 20711777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mean Species Abundance as a Measure of Ecotoxicological Risk. Hoeks S; Huijbregts MAJ; Douziech M; Hendriks AJ; Oldenkamp R Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Nov; 39(11):2304-2313. PubMed ID: 32786097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SSDs revisited: part II-practical considerations in the development and use of application factors applied to species sensitivity distributions. Belanger SE; Carr GJ Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1526-1541. PubMed ID: 30994956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of potential bias in the sensitivity of toxicity data used to construct sensitivity distributions for copper. Croteau K; Santore R; DeForest D; Baken S Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 May; 15(3):437-447. PubMed ID: 30609308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can We Reasonably Predict Chronic Species Sensitivity Distributions from Acute Species Sensitivity Distributions? Hiki K; Iwasaki Y Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(20):13131-13136. PubMed ID: 32924457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment. Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of General Unified Threshold Models of Survival Models for Regulatory Aquatic Pesticide Risk Assessment Illustrated with an Example for the Insecticide Chlorpyrifos. Brock T; Arena M; Cedergreen N; Charles S; Duquesne S; Ippolito A; Klein M; Reed M; Teodorovic I; van den Brink PJ; Focks A Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Jan; 17(1):243-258. PubMed ID: 32786054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]