These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31433136)

  • 1. Accuracy of IOS in Full-Arch Dentate Patients Compared to CBCT Cast-Scanning. An In-Vivo Study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Pavlakis E; Kourakis G; Papavasiliou G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Aug; 27(3):122-130. PubMed ID: 31433136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
    Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods.
    Ye J; Wang S; Wang Z; Liu Y; Sun Y; Ye H; Zhou Y
    Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 36068382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.
    Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
    de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies.
    Emara A; Sharma N; Halbeisen FS; Msallem B; Thieringer FM
    Dent J (Basel); 2020 Aug; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 32748890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The precision of two alternative indirect workflows for digital model production: an illusion or a possibility?
    Elkersh NM; Fahmy RA; Zayet MK; Gaweesh YS; Hassan MG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3787-3797. PubMed ID: 37046002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suitability and accuracy of CBCT model scan: an in vitro study.
    Robben J; Muallah J; Wesemann C; Nowak R; Mah J; Pospiech P; Bumann A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):363-375. PubMed ID: 29292411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of accuracy and repeatability using CBCT and a dental scanner by means of 3D software.
    Kim SR; Kim CM; Jeong ID; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 28294206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trueness of cone beam computed tomography versus intra-oral scanner derived three-dimensional digital models: An ex vivo study.
    Al-Rimawi A; Shaheen E; Albdour EA; Shujaat S; Politis C; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 30977212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al-Kaff FT
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; McGlumphy EA; Lee DJ; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 29703673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods.
    Lim SW; Hwang HS; Cho IS; Baek SH; Cho JH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Mar; 157(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 32115113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing CBCT to model scanner for dental model scanning. An in vitro imaging accuracy study.
    Tsolakis IA; Rontogianni A; Tsolakis AI; Papadopoulos MA
    Int Orthod; 2024 Mar; 22(1):100840. PubMed ID: 38215684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fully automatic integration of dental CBCT images and full-arch intraoral impressions with stitching error correction via individual tooth segmentation and identification.
    Jang TJ; Yun HS; Hyun CM; Kim JE; Lee SH; Seo JK
    Med Image Anal; 2024 Apr; 93():103096. PubMed ID: 38301347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is Intraoral Scanning Accurate to Evaluate Dental Implant Position? An In-Vitro Study.
    Bergamaschi IP; Cortellazzi KL; Sverzut AT
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr; 81(4):441-455. PubMed ID: 36584976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Rydén J; Thor A
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():110-118. PubMed ID: 29246490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.