These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31433391)

  • 1. Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement upon changes in marginal peri-implant bone level. A systematic review.
    Pellicer-Chover H; Díaz-Sanchez M; Soto-Peñaloza D; Peñarrocha-Diago MA; Canullo L; Peñarrocha-Oltra D
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2019 Sep; 24(5):e673-e683. PubMed ID: 31433391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Valles C; Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Clementini M; Baglivo M; Paniagua B; Nart J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):555-570. PubMed ID: 29313133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical comparison between crestal and subcrestal dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; de Luna Gomes JM; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):408-417. PubMed ID: 33358610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiographic results of crestal vs. subcrestal placement of implants in posterior areas: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Sun Y; Yang J; Chen K; Li Z; Chen Z; Huang B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):948-959. PubMed ID: 37259774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: A prospective comparative study.
    Pellicer-Chover H; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Gomar-Vercher S; Agustín-Panadero R; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Jan; 21(1):e103-10. PubMed ID: 26615504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading.
    Lombardo G; Corrocher G; Pighi J; Faccioni F; Rovera A; Marincola M; Nocini PF
    Minerva Stomatol; 2014; 63(11-12):391-402. PubMed ID: 25503340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Apico-Coronal Implant Position Influence Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss? A 36-Month Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Pellicer-Chover H; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Aloy-Prosper A; Canullo L; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 77(3):515-527. PubMed ID: 30529378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; López-López PJ; Mate Sanchez JE; Gargallo Albiol J; Velasco Ortega E; Delgado Ruiz R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 24118345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiographic Crestal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants Placed at Crestal or Subcrestal Level: One-Year Findings.
    Gatti C; Gatti F; Silvestri M; Mintrone F; Rossi R; Tridondani G; Piacentini G; Borrelli P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):913-918. PubMed ID: 30025009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft tissue changes and crestal bone loss around platform-switched implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels: 36-month results from a prospective split-mouth clinical trial.
    Al Amri MD; Al-Johany SS; Al Baker AM; Al Rifaiy MQ; Abduljabbar TS; Al-Kheraif AA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1342-1347. PubMed ID: 27743396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peri-implant tissue healing at implants with different designs and placement protocols: An experimental study in dogs.
    Oskarsson M; Otsuki M; Welander M; Abrahamsson I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):873-880. PubMed ID: 30009476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone Loss in Implants Placed at Subcrestal and Crestal Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Palacios-Garzón N; Velasco-Ortega E; López-López J
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 30621286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results after subcrestal or crestal placement of delayed loaded implants.
    Romanos GE; Aydin E; Gaertner K; Nentwig GH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 23675969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Study of the Crestal vs Subcrestal Placement of Dental Implants via Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation.
    Chatterjee P; Shashikala R; Navneetham A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):623-627. PubMed ID: 36259302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crestal bone level changes around immediately placed implants: a systematic review and meta-analyses with at least 12 months' follow-up after functional loading.
    Kinaia BM; Shah M; Neely AL; Goodis HE
    J Periodontol; 2014 Nov; 85(11):1537-48. PubMed ID: 24794689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of implant-abutment junction position on crestal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Saleh MHA; Ravidà A; Suárez-López Del Amo F; Lin GH; Asa'ad F; Wang HL
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):617-633. PubMed ID: 29575584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement.
    Koutouzis T; Fetner M; Fetner A; Lundgren T
    J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20731584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of supracrestal tissue attachment thickness on radiographic bone level around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Díaz-Sánchez M; Soto-Peñaloza D; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    J Periodontal Res; 2019 Dec; 54(6):573-588. PubMed ID: 31231802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of implant placement depth on the peri-implant bone defect configurations in ligature-induced peri-implantitis: An experimental study in dogs.
    Huang B; Zhang L; Xu L; Zhu W; Witek L; Tovar N; Coelho PG; Meng H
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2018 Jan; 23(1):e30-e37. PubMed ID: 29274159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.