BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31435332)

  • 21. Association of Radiographic Signs in Determining the Proximity of Mandibular Third Molar Roots to the Mandibular Canal and Postoperative Occurrence of Neurosensory Disorders: A Cohort Study.
    Nayak V; Kumar S; Madhuri S; Kannaiyan K; Mathew M; Kyaw Soe HH; Donald PM; Anand Meundi M; Bhowal S
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e51085. PubMed ID: 38274929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of Specific Panoramic High-Risk Signs in Impacted Third Molar Cases in Which Cone Beam Computed Tomography Changes the Treatment Decision.
    Szalma J; Vajta L; Lovász BV; Kiss C; Soós B; Lempel E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):1061-1070. PubMed ID: 32304662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the diagnostic value of CBCT and Digital Panoramic Radiography with surgical findings to determine the proximity of an impacted third mandibular molar to the inferior alveolar nerve canal.
    Saraydar-Baser R; Dehghani-Tafti M; Navab-Azam A; Ezoddini-Ardakani F; Nayer S; Safi Y; Shamloo N
    J Med Life; 2015; 8(Spec Iss 3):83-89. PubMed ID: 28316671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
    Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Characteristic findings on panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT to predict paresthesia after extraction of impacted third molar.
    Harada N; Beloor Vasudeva S; Matsuda Y; Seki K; Kapila R; Ishikawa N; Okano T; Sano T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2015; 56(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25765570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preoperative Anatomic Evaluation of the Relationship Between Inferior Alveolar Nerve Canal and Impacted Mandibular Third Molar in a Population of Bhubaneswar, Odisha, Using CBCT: A Hospital-Based Study.
    Mohanty R; Rout P; Singh V
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2020 Jun; 19(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 32346237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis.
    Deppe H; Ritschl LM; Kleinschmidt J; Wagenpfeil S; Sculean A
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(6):470-477. PubMed ID: 31086860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in predicting mandibular nerve exposure during third molar surgery.
    Hasani A; Ahmadi Moshtaghin F; Roohi P; Rakhshan V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 46(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27810140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of orthopantomography and computed tomography image for assessing the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and mandibular canal.
    Katakam SK; Shankar U; Thakur D; Reddy TP; Hari KR; Janga D
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):819-23. PubMed ID: 23404009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the reliability of radiographic signs on panoramic radiographs to determine the relationship between mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar canal.
    Uzun C; Sumer AP; Sumer M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Mar; 129(3):260-271. PubMed ID: 31983633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Positive Predictive Value of Panoramic Radiography for Assessment of the Relationship of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with the Mandibular Canal Based on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Tofangchiha M; Koushaei S; Mortazavi M; Souri Z; Alizadeh A; Patini R
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34573920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study between multilayer and conventional panoramic radiography.
    Machado AH; Freitas DQ; Fontenele RC; Farias-Gomes A; Francesquini Júnior L; Ambrosano GMB
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Nov; 27(11):6451-6460. PubMed ID: 37728617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars.
    Mahasantipiya PM; Savage NW; Monsour PA; Wilson RJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):154-63. PubMed ID: 15897286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
    Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Darkening of third molar roots: panoramic radiographic associations with inferior alveolar nerve exposure.
    Szalma J; Lempel E; Jeges S; Olasz L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jun; 69(6):1544-9. PubMed ID: 21292368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Signs of the proximity of third molar roots to the mandibular canal: an observational study in panoramic radiographs.
    Lacerda-Santos JT; Granja GL; Catão MHCV; Araújo FF; Freitas GB; Araújo-Filho JCWP; Freire JCP; Dias-Ribeiro E; Santos JA
    Gen Dent; 2020; 68(2):30-35. PubMed ID: 32105223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of two enhancement tools on the assessment of the relationship between third molars and the inferior alveolar canal.
    Peixoto LR; Gonzaga AK; Melo SL; Pontual ML; Pontual Ados A; de Melo DP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 25887428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos KF; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 31072782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can CBCT change the level of confidence of oral maxillofacial surgeons in mandibular third molar management?
    Wanzeler AMV; Silveira HLDD; Buligon RP; Corsetti A; Vieira HT; Arús NA; Vizzotto MB
    Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e078. PubMed ID: 35703704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.