These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31435999)

  • 1. Technical consideration in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: A review of antithrombotic and PCI therapies.
    Marquis-Gravel G; Zeitouni M; Kochar A; Jones WS; Sketch MH; Rao SV; Patel MR; Ohman EM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 95(5):924-931. PubMed ID: 31435999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Lemor A; Basir MB; Patel K; Kolski B; Kaki A; Kapur NK; Riley R; Finley J; Goldsweig A; Aronow HD; Belford PM; Tehrani B; Truesdell AG; Lasorda D; Bharadwaj A; Hanson I; LaLonde T; Gorgis S; O'Neill W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(10):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 32360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of Intracoronary Fibrinolytic Therapy in Contemporary PCI Practice.
    Agarwal SK; Agarwal S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1165-1171. PubMed ID: 30685340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Khalid MF; Khan AA; Khattak F; Ayub MT; Bagai J; Mukherjee D; Helton T; Cohen MG; Banerjee S; Paul TK
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Nov; 20(11):956-964. PubMed ID: 30638891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention with aspiration thrombectomy Vs. Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Dominguez AC; Bittl JA; El-Hayek G; Contreras E; Tamis-Holland JE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 87(7):1203-10. PubMed ID: 26699698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Aggarwal B; Aman W; Jeroudi O; Kleiman NS
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2018; 14(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29623169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic Value of SYNTAX Score in Patients With Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial.
    Guedeney P; Barthélémy O; Zeitouni M; Hauguel-Moreau M; Hage G; Kerneis M; Lattuca B; Overtchouk P; Rouanet S; Fuernau G; de Waha-Thiele S; Zeymer U; Sandri M; Akin I; Desch S; Thiele H; Montalescot G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(10):1198-1206. PubMed ID: 32438990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New insights into cardiogenic shock and coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.
    Gerbaud E; Elbaz M; Lattuca B
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):276-284. PubMed ID: 32088156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of thrombus aspiration during ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a six month composite endpoint and risk of stroke analyses of the TASTE trial.
    Olivecrona GK; Lagerqvist B; Fröbert O; Gudnason T; Maeng M; Råmunddal T; Haupt J; Kellerth T; Stewart J; Sarno G; Jensen J; Östlund O; James SK
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Apr; 16():62. PubMed ID: 27036735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry.
    Wayangankar SA; Bangalore S; McCoy LA; Jneid H; Latif F; Karrowni W; Charitakis K; Feldman DN; Dakik HA; Mauri L; Peterson ED; Messenger J; Roe M; Mukherjee D; Klein A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 9(4):341-351. PubMed ID: 26803418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigator Versus Core Laboratory Evaluation of Coronary Flow and Related Mortality in the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial.
    Zeitouni M; Barthélémy O; Hauguel-Moreau M; Guedeney P; Rouanet S; Hage G; Overtchouk P; Brugier D; Vignolles N; Kerneis M; Silvain J; Collet JP; Vicaut E; Desch S; Zeymer U; Thiele H; Montalescot G
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(10):e008296. PubMed ID: 31607157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical characteristics, angiographic findings, and one-year outcome of 101 consecutive stent thrombosis cases in British Columbia.
    Lempereur M; Bogale N; Fahmy P; Shiekh I; Starovoytov A; Aymong E; Boone R; Robinson S; Charania J; Townley R; Thompson C; Kmetic A; Ding L; Fung A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Mar; 17(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 26905061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Kakouros N; Malhotra R; Kolte D; Feldman DN; Abbott JD; Fisher DZ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 94(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 30593731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.
    Alsidawi S; Effat M; Rahman S; Abdallah M; Leesar M
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Dec; 33(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 26363283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of Timing of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Events on Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The ADAPT-DES Study.
    Brener SJ; Kirtane AJ; Stuckey TD; Witzenbichler B; Rinaldi MJ; Neumann FJ; Metzger DC; Henry TD; Cox DA; Duffy PL; Mazzaferri EL; Mehran R; Parvataneni R; Brodie BR; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(14):1450-7. PubMed ID: 27372190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delayed versus immediate stenting for the treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction with a high thrombus burden.
    Ke D; Zhong W; Fan L; Chen L
    Coron Artery Dis; 2012 Nov; 23(7):497-506. PubMed ID: 22968214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validating Utility of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score in a Large Pooled Cohort From 3 Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Studies.
    Yoshikawa Y; Shiomi H; Watanabe H; Natsuaki M; Kondo H; Tamura T; Nakagawa Y; Morimoto T; Kimura T
    Circulation; 2018 Feb; 137(6):551-562. PubMed ID: 28982692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Practical Approach to Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Interventional Perspective.
    Atkinson TM; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Rab T; Cigarroa JE;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):871-83. PubMed ID: 27151604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.