These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31436166)

  • 1. Association of Online Learning Behavior and Learning Outcomes for Medical Students: Large-Scale Usage Data Analysis.
    Bientzle M; Hircin E; Kimmerle J; Knipfer C; Smeets R; Gaudin R; Holtz P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 5(2):e13529. PubMed ID: 31436166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.
    Gibson SI
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1322. PubMed ID: 26500828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
    Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.
    Smith CD; Dai A; Kenwright D; Grainger R
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2020; 9():27. PubMed ID: 38058910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions.
    Rangel RH; Möller L; Sitter H; Stibane T; Strzelczyk A
    Med Teach; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 28799435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.
    McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: a prospective cohort study.
    Kühbeck F; Berberat PO; Engelhardt S; Sarikas A
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Nov; 19(1):412. PubMed ID: 31703687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First steps of learning analytics in a blended learning general practice curriculum at Saarland University - a quantitative approach.
    Junge H; Schuster K; Salzmann A; Volz-Willems S; Jäger J; Dupont F
    GMS J Med Educ; 2023; 40(6):Doc71. PubMed ID: 38125898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of peer-generated MCQs to assess and support learning in a problem-based learning programme.
    Botelho MG; Lam O; Watt RM; Leung D; Kember D
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Aug; 22(3):e358-e363. PubMed ID: 29266581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study.
    Craft JA; Christensen M; Shaw N; Bakon S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Dec; 59():6-11. PubMed ID: 28898728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactive Learning: Online Audience Response System and Multiple Choice Questions Improve Student Participation in Lectures.
    Goyal M; Agarwal M; Goel A
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42527. PubMed ID: 37637674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Student perception and post-exam analysis of one best MCQs and one correct MCQs: A comparative study.
    Adhi MI; Aly SM
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Apr; 68(4):570-575. PubMed ID: 29808047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practice makes perfect! Patient safety starts in medical school: Do instructional videos improve clinical skills and hygiene procedures in undergraduate medical students?
    Bäwert A; Holzinger A
    GMS J Med Educ; 2019; 36(2):Doc16. PubMed ID: 30993174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The art of note taking with mobile devices in medical education.
    Pyörälä E; Mäenpää S; Heinonen L; Folger D; Masalin T; Hervonen H
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 30940152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blended Learning: The impact of blackboard formative assessment on the final marks and students' perception of its effectiveness.
    Baig M; Gazzaz ZJ; Farouq M
    Pak J Med Sci; 2020; 36(3):327-332. PubMed ID: 32292428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.
    Kurtz JB; Lourie MA; Holman EE; Grob KL; Monrad SU
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1630239. PubMed ID: 31248355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ChatGPT in medical school: how successful is AI in progress testing?
    Friederichs H; Friederichs WJ; März M
    Med Educ Online; 2023 Dec; 28(1):2220920. PubMed ID: 37307503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Progressive clinical case-based multiple-choice questions: An innovative way to evaluate and rank undergraduate medical students.
    Cohen Aubart F; Lhote R; Hertig A; Noel N; Costedoat-Chalumeau N; Cariou A; Meyer G; Cymbalista F; de Prost N; Pottier P; Joly L; Lambotte O; Renaud MC; Badoual C; Braun M; Palombi O; Duguet A; Roux D
    Rev Med Interne; 2021 May; 42(5):302-309. PubMed ID: 33518414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.