226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31436245)
1. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma
Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
Ding JR; Wang DN; Pan JL
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(2):744-50. PubMed ID: 27461644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.
Cheng L; Bai Y; Zhang J; Liu M; Li X; Zhang A; Zhang X; Ma L
Tumour Biol; 2013 Jun; 34(3):1537-45. PubMed ID: 23397543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Turbo Spin-echo Diffusion-weighted Imaging Compared with Single-shot Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging: Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance When Differentiating between Ductal Carcinoma in situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Mori N; Mugikura S; Miyashita M; Mori Y; Maekawa Y; Nagasaka T; Takase K
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2021 Mar; 20(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 32147641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of DW/DCE-MRI features with prognostic factors in breast cancer.
Shao G; Fan L; Zhang J; Dai G; Xie T
Int J Biol Markers; 2017 Mar; 32(1):e118-e125. PubMed ID: 27646773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
Iima M; Le Bihan D; Okumura R; Okada T; Fujimoto K; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Fujimoto M; Sakashita H; Togashi K
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 21633054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm(2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes.
Ochi M; Kuroiwa T; Sunami S; Murakami J; Miyahara S; Nagaie T; Oya M; Yabuuchi H; Hatakenaka M
Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 20(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 22161277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity predicts invasive components in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yoon HJ; Kim Y; Kim BS
Eur Radiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):3648-58. PubMed ID: 26063655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters.
Mori N; Ota H; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Tominaga J; Ishida T; Watanabe M; Takase K; Takahashi S
Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2705-12. PubMed ID: 23732688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Kim JY; Kim JJ; Lee JW; Lee NK; Lee G; Kang T; Park H; Son YH; Grimm R
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30073498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Predict Grade, Microinvasion, and Invasion in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
Hussein H; Chung C; Moshonov H; Miller N; Kulkarni SR; Scaranelo AM
Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1483-8. PubMed ID: 26391856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Triexponential Diffusion Analysis of Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Ohno M; Ohno N; Miyati T; Kawashima H; Kozaka K; Matsuura Y; Gabata T; Kobayashi S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2021 Dec; 20(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 33563872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.
Choi SY; Chang YW; Park HJ; Kim HJ; Hong SS; Seo DY
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e474-9. PubMed ID: 22128125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different distribution of breast ductal carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion, and invasion breast cancer.
Zhang W; Gao EL; Zhou YL; Zhai Q; Zou ZY; Guo GL; Chen GR; Zheng HM; Huang GL; Zhang XH
World J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 10():262. PubMed ID: 23216911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Bogner W; Spick C; Bagó-Horváth Z; Weber M; Helbich T; Baltzer P
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25333308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Added value of mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values for evaluating histologic phenotypes of invasive ductal breast cancer with MR imaging.
Suo S; Zhang D; Cheng F; Cao M; Hua J; Lu J; Xu J
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 30116958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.
Park MJ; Cha ES; Kang BJ; Ihn YK; Baik JH
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 17923781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma.
Nadrljanski M; Maksimović R; Plešinac-Karapandžić V; Nikitović M; Marković-Vasiljković B; Milošević Z
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1363-7. PubMed ID: 24894697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
