These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31436245)
1. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer. Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Ding JR; Wang DN; Pan JL J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(2):744-50. PubMed ID: 27461644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement. Cheng L; Bai Y; Zhang J; Liu M; Li X; Zhang A; Zhang X; Ma L Tumour Biol; 2013 Jun; 34(3):1537-45. PubMed ID: 23397543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Turbo Spin-echo Diffusion-weighted Imaging Compared with Single-shot Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging: Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance When Differentiating between Ductal Carcinoma in situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma. Mori N; Mugikura S; Miyashita M; Mori Y; Maekawa Y; Nagasaka T; Takase K Magn Reson Med Sci; 2021 Mar; 20(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 32147641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of DW/DCE-MRI features with prognostic factors in breast cancer. Shao G; Fan L; Zhang J; Dai G; Xie T Int J Biol Markers; 2017 Mar; 32(1):e118-e125. PubMed ID: 27646773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. Iima M; Le Bihan D; Okumura R; Okada T; Fujimoto K; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Fujimoto M; Sakashita H; Togashi K Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 21633054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm(2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes. Ochi M; Kuroiwa T; Sunami S; Murakami J; Miyahara S; Nagaie T; Oya M; Yabuuchi H; Hatakenaka M Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 20(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 22161277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity predicts invasive components in breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Yoon HJ; Kim Y; Kim BS Eur Radiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):3648-58. PubMed ID: 26063655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters. Mori N; Ota H; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Tominaga J; Ishida T; Watanabe M; Takase K; Takahashi S Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2705-12. PubMed ID: 23732688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Kim JY; Kim JJ; Lee JW; Lee NK; Lee G; Kang T; Park H; Son YH; Grimm R Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30073498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Predict Grade, Microinvasion, and Invasion in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Hussein H; Chung C; Moshonov H; Miller N; Kulkarni SR; Scaranelo AM Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1483-8. PubMed ID: 26391856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Triexponential Diffusion Analysis of Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma. Ohno M; Ohno N; Miyati T; Kawashima H; Kozaka K; Matsuura Y; Gabata T; Kobayashi S Magn Reson Med Sci; 2021 Dec; 20(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 33563872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla. Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer. Choi SY; Chang YW; Park HJ; Kim HJ; Hong SS; Seo DY Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e474-9. PubMed ID: 22128125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different distribution of breast ductal carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion, and invasion breast cancer. Zhang W; Gao EL; Zhou YL; Zhai Q; Zou ZY; Guo GL; Chen GR; Zheng HM; Huang GL; Zhang XH World J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 10():262. PubMed ID: 23216911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Bogner W; Spick C; Bagó-Horváth Z; Weber M; Helbich T; Baltzer P Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25333308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Added value of mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values for evaluating histologic phenotypes of invasive ductal breast cancer with MR imaging. Suo S; Zhang D; Cheng F; Cao M; Hua J; Lu J; Xu J Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 30116958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Park MJ; Cha ES; Kang BJ; Ihn YK; Baik JH Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 17923781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma. Nadrljanski M; Maksimović R; Plešinac-Karapandžić V; Nikitović M; Marković-Vasiljković B; Milošević Z Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1363-7. PubMed ID: 24894697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]