BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31436809)

  • 21. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
    Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
    Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Strosberg DS; Merritt RE; Perry KA
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 27495339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer: The role of surgical and radiation treatment parameters in the development of anastomotic complications.
    Alfaifi S; Chu R; Hui X; Broderick S; Hooker C; Brock M; Bush E; Hales R; Anderson L; Hoff J; Friedes C; Han-Oh S; Mcnutt T; Ha J; Yang S; Battafarano R; Feliciano J; Voong KR
    Thorac Cancer; 2021 Dec; 12(23):3121-3129. PubMed ID: 34651445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Esophagogastric Anastomosis Using the Transoral Orvil for the End-to-Side Ivor-Lewis Technique.
    Laxa BU; Harold KL; Jaroszewski DE
    Innovations (Phila); 2009 Nov; 4(6):319-25. PubMed ID: 22437228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
    Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of thoracic versus cervical anastomosis on anastomotic leak among patients who undergo esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
    Chidi AP; Etchill EW; Ha JS; Bush EL; Yang SC; Battafarano RJ; Broderick SR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 160(4):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 32299695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proximal anastomosis using the OrVil circular stapler in major upper gastrointestinal surgery.
    Knight BC; Rice SJ; Devitt PG; Lord A; Game PA; Thompson SK
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Jul; 18(7):1345-9. PubMed ID: 24553876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Technical and early outcomes of Ivor Lewis minimally invasive oesophagectomy for gastric tube construction in the thoracic cavity.
    Wu W; Zhu Q; Chen L; Liu J
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Jan; 18(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 24144805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of outcomes of a transoral circular stapled anastomosis following major upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.
    Foley DM; Emanuwa EJE; Knight WRC; Baker CR; Kelly M; McEwan R; Zylstra J; Davies AR; Gossage JA
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Nov; 34(11):. PubMed ID: 33554244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
    Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modifications in retrosternal reconstruction after oesophagogastrectomy may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage.
    Hu H; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang J; Luketich JD; Chen H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Aug; 42(2):359-63. PubMed ID: 22345283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
    Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Usage of "Reversal Penetrating Technique" with Ancillary Trocar in Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
    Pan S; Shen G; Wu M
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Jan; 27(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 27322680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome.
    Pines G; Buyeviz V; Machlenkin S; Klein Y; Laor A; Kashtan H
    Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 19431220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: operative technique and short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; De Pascale S; Ascari F; Petz WL; Fumagalli Romario U
    Updates Surg; 2021 Oct; 73(5):1837-1847. PubMed ID: 33900550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy.
    Yuan Y; Zeng X; Hu Y; Xie T; Zhao Y
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD008446. PubMed ID: 25274134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and manual cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Cayi R; Li M; Xiong G; Cai K; Wang W
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):908-9. PubMed ID: 22699083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.