BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31436831)

  • 1. A paradigm shift from surgical to transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials).
    Taggart DP
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Sep; 115(11):e107-e108. PubMed ID: 31436831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The beginning of a new era in the field of percutaneous valvular interventions (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials).
    Dudek D
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Sep; 115(11):e105-e106. PubMed ID: 31436829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When to SAVR in the age of TAVR? A perspective on surgical aortic valve replacement in 2018.
    Wyler von Ballmoos MC; Barker CM; Reul RM; Dadu R; Ramchandani M; Kleiman NS; Reardon MJ
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):139-141. PubMed ID: 29661491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Low Surgical Risk Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Elgendy IY; Mahmoud AN; Gad MM; Elbadawi A; Rivero F; Alfonso F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(14):1399-1401. PubMed ID: 31320035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochrane corner: transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.
    Kolkailah AA; Doukky R; Pelletier MP; Volgman AS; Kaneko T; Nabhan AF
    Heart; 2020 Jul; 106(14):1043-1045. PubMed ID: 32482670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Superior to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement?: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Pagnesi M; Chiarito M; Stefanini GG; Testa L; Reimers B; Colombo A; Latib A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(18):1899-1901. PubMed ID: 28935083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of small prosthesis size on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes.
    Salna M; Khalique OK; Chiuzan C; Kurlansky P; Borger MA; Hahn RT; Leon MB; Smith CR; Kodali SK; George I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):765-773. PubMed ID: 28470996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials and Propensity-Matched Studies.
    Rawasia WF; Usman MS; Mujeeb FA; Zafar M; Khan SU; Alkhouli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 31672536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Will transcatheter aortic valve implantation represent the choice treatment for all patients who need a biological valve?
    Spaccarotella C; Mongiardo A; Curcio A; De Rosa S; Indolfi C
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2020 May; 21(5):345-348. PubMed ID: 32141974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcatheter Valve Replacement: Risk Levels and Contemporary Outcomes.
    Reyes M; Reardon MJ
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2017; 13(3):126-131. PubMed ID: 29743997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.
    Head SJ; Reardon MJ; Deeb GM; Van Mieghem NM; Popma JJ; Gleason TG; Williams MR; Radhakrishnan S; Fremes S; Oh JK; Chang Y; Boulware MJ; Kappetein AP
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(4):e007396. PubMed ID: 30929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TAVR for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses Using a Self-Expanding Device: 1-Year Results From the Prospective VIVA Postmarket Study.
    Tchétché D; Chevalier B; Holzhey D; Harnath A; Schäfer U; Teiger E; Manigold T; Modine T; Souteyrand G; Champagnac D; Oh JK; Li S; Verhoye JP; Kornowski R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 12(10):923-932. PubMed ID: 31122349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Durability and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses.
    Dauerman HL; Deeb GM; O'Hair DP; Waksman R; Yakubov SJ; Kleiman NS; Chetcuti SJ; Hermiller JB; Bajwa T; Khabbaz K; de Marchena E; Salerno T; Dries-Devlin JL; Li S; Popma JJ; Reardon MJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(10):e008155. PubMed ID: 31607151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice?
    Bashir M; Harky A; Bleetman D; Adams B; Roberts N; Balmforth D; Yap J; Lall K; Shipolini A; Oo A; Uppal R
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 28935509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond Mortality: Unveiling the Nuances of Quality of Life in Aortic Valve Interventions.
    Tarantini G; Nai Fovino L
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Apr; 17(8):989-991. PubMed ID: 38658127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Novel Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Are Suboptimal for Surgery: Results of the Evolut R U.S. Study.
    Popma JJ; Reardon MJ; Khabbaz K; Harrison JK; Hughes GC; Kodali S; George I; Deeb GM; Chetcuti S; Kipperman R; Brown J; Qiao H; Slater J; Williams MR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 10(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28183466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter Replacement of Failed Bioprosthetic Valves: Large Multicenter Assessment of the Effect of Implantation Depth on Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve-in-Valve.
    Simonato M; Webb J; Kornowski R; Vahanian A; Frerker C; Nissen H; Bleiziffer S; Duncan A; Rodés-Cabau J; Attizzani GF; Horlick E; Latib A; Bekeredjian R; Barbanti M; Lefevre T; Cerillo A; Hernández JM; Bruschi G; Spargias K; Iadanza A; Brecker S; Palma JH; Finkelstein A; Abdel-Wahab M; Lemos P; Petronio AS; Champagnac D; Sinning JM; Salizzoni S; Napodano M; Fiorina C; Marzocchi A; Leon M; Dvir D
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27301396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.