These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31436831)

  • 1. A paradigm shift from surgical to transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials).
    Taggart DP
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Sep; 115(11):e107-e108. PubMed ID: 31436831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The beginning of a new era in the field of percutaneous valvular interventions (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials).
    Dudek D
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Sep; 115(11):e105-e106. PubMed ID: 31436829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When to SAVR in the age of TAVR? A perspective on surgical aortic valve replacement in 2018.
    Wyler von Ballmoos MC; Barker CM; Reul RM; Dadu R; Ramchandani M; Kleiman NS; Reardon MJ
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):139-141. PubMed ID: 29661491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Low Surgical Risk Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Elgendy IY; Mahmoud AN; Gad MM; Elbadawi A; Rivero F; Alfonso F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(14):1399-1401. PubMed ID: 31320035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochrane corner: transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.
    Kolkailah AA; Doukky R; Pelletier MP; Volgman AS; Kaneko T; Nabhan AF
    Heart; 2020 Jul; 106(14):1043-1045. PubMed ID: 32482670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Superior to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement?: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Pagnesi M; Chiarito M; Stefanini GG; Testa L; Reimers B; Colombo A; Latib A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(18):1899-1901. PubMed ID: 28935083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of small prosthesis size on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes.
    Salna M; Khalique OK; Chiuzan C; Kurlansky P; Borger MA; Hahn RT; Leon MB; Smith CR; Kodali SK; George I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):765-773. PubMed ID: 28470996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials and Propensity-Matched Studies.
    Rawasia WF; Usman MS; Mujeeb FA; Zafar M; Khan SU; Alkhouli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 31672536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Will transcatheter aortic valve implantation represent the choice treatment for all patients who need a biological valve?
    Spaccarotella C; Mongiardo A; Curcio A; De Rosa S; Indolfi C
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2020 May; 21(5):345-348. PubMed ID: 32141974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcatheter Valve Replacement: Risk Levels and Contemporary Outcomes.
    Reyes M; Reardon MJ
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2017; 13(3):126-131. PubMed ID: 29743997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.
    Head SJ; Reardon MJ; Deeb GM; Van Mieghem NM; Popma JJ; Gleason TG; Williams MR; Radhakrishnan S; Fremes S; Oh JK; Chang Y; Boulware MJ; Kappetein AP
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(4):e007396. PubMed ID: 30929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TAVR for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses Using a Self-Expanding Device: 1-Year Results From the Prospective VIVA Postmarket Study.
    Tchétché D; Chevalier B; Holzhey D; Harnath A; Schäfer U; Teiger E; Manigold T; Modine T; Souteyrand G; Champagnac D; Oh JK; Li S; Verhoye JP; Kornowski R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 12(10):923-932. PubMed ID: 31122349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Durability and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses.
    Dauerman HL; Deeb GM; O'Hair DP; Waksman R; Yakubov SJ; Kleiman NS; Chetcuti SJ; Hermiller JB; Bajwa T; Khabbaz K; de Marchena E; Salerno T; Dries-Devlin JL; Li S; Popma JJ; Reardon MJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(10):e008155. PubMed ID: 31607151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice?
    Bashir M; Harky A; Bleetman D; Adams B; Roberts N; Balmforth D; Yap J; Lall K; Shipolini A; Oo A; Uppal R
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 28935509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond Mortality: Unveiling the Nuances of Quality of Life in Aortic Valve Interventions.
    Tarantini G; Nai Fovino L
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Apr; 17(8):989-991. PubMed ID: 38658127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Novel Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Are Suboptimal for Surgery: Results of the Evolut R U.S. Study.
    Popma JJ; Reardon MJ; Khabbaz K; Harrison JK; Hughes GC; Kodali S; George I; Deeb GM; Chetcuti S; Kipperman R; Brown J; Qiao H; Slater J; Williams MR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 10(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28183466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter Replacement of Failed Bioprosthetic Valves: Large Multicenter Assessment of the Effect of Implantation Depth on Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve-in-Valve.
    Simonato M; Webb J; Kornowski R; Vahanian A; Frerker C; Nissen H; Bleiziffer S; Duncan A; Rodés-Cabau J; Attizzani GF; Horlick E; Latib A; Bekeredjian R; Barbanti M; Lefevre T; Cerillo A; Hernández JM; Bruschi G; Spargias K; Iadanza A; Brecker S; Palma JH; Finkelstein A; Abdel-Wahab M; Lemos P; Petronio AS; Champagnac D; Sinning JM; Salizzoni S; Napodano M; Fiorina C; Marzocchi A; Leon M; Dvir D
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27301396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.