These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31436990)

  • 1. QresFEP: An Automated Protocol for Free Energy Calculations of Protein Mutations in Q.
    Jespers W; Isaksen GV; Andberg TAH; Vasile S; van Veen A; Åqvist J; Brandsdal BO; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Oct; 15(10):5461-5473. PubMed ID: 31436990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the Effect of Amino Acid Single-Point Mutations on Protein Stability-Large-Scale Validation of MD-Based Relative Free Energy Calculations.
    Steinbrecher T; Zhu C; Wang L; Abel R; Negron C; Pearlman D; Feyfant E; Duan J; Sherman W
    J Mol Biol; 2017 Apr; 429(7):948-963. PubMed ID: 27964946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction.
    Jespers W; Åqvist J; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():203-226. PubMed ID: 33759129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Qgui: A high-throughput interface for automated setup and analysis of free energy calculations and empirical valence bond simulations in biological systems.
    Isaksen GV; Andberg TA; Åqvist J; Brandsdal BO
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Jul; 60():15-23. PubMed ID: 26080356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. pmx: Automated protein structure and topology generation for alchemical perturbations.
    Gapsys V; Michielssens S; Seeliger D; de Groot BL
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Feb; 36(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 25487359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. QligFEP: an automated workflow for small molecule free energy calculations in Q.
    Jespers W; Esguerra M; Åqvist J; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
    J Cheminform; 2019 Apr; 11(1):26. PubMed ID: 30941533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.
    Raman EP; Paul TJ; Hayes RL; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7895-7914. PubMed ID: 33201701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Free Energy Perturbation Calculations of the Thermodynamics of Protein Side-Chain Mutations.
    Steinbrecher T; Abel R; Clark A; Friesner R
    J Mol Biol; 2017 Apr; 429(7):923-929. PubMed ID: 28279701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CHARMM-GUI Ligand Binder for absolute binding free energy calculations and its application.
    Jo S; Jiang W; Lee HS; Roux B; Im W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):267-77. PubMed ID: 23205773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations.
    Abel R; Wang L; Harder ED; Berne BJ; Friesner RA
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Jul; 50(7):1625-1632. PubMed ID: 28677954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.
    Kaus JW; Harder E; Lin T; Abel R; McCammon JA; Wang L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2670-9. PubMed ID: 26085821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular dynamics of NPY Y1 receptor activation.
    Sylte I; Andrianjara CR; Calvet A; Pascal Y; Dahl SG
    Bioorg Med Chem; 1999 Dec; 7(12):2737-48. PubMed ID: 10658578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standard Binding Free-Energy Calculations: How Far Are We from Automation?
    Fu H; Chipot C; Shao X; Cai W
    J Phys Chem B; 2023 Dec; 127(49):10459-10468. PubMed ID: 37824848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computation of standard binding free energies of polar and charged ligands to the glutamate receptor GluA2.
    Heinzelmann G; Chen PC; Kuyucak S
    J Phys Chem B; 2014 Feb; 118(7):1813-24. PubMed ID: 24479628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the G-protein-coupled neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor agonist and antagonist binding sites.
    Du P; Salon JA; Tamm JA; Hou C; Cui W; Walker MW; Adham N; Dhanoa DS; Islam I; Vaysse PJ; Dowling B; Shifman Y; Boyle N; Rueger H; Schmidlin T; Yamaguchi Y; Branchek TA; Weinshank RL; Gluchowski C
    Protein Eng; 1997 Feb; 10(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 9089810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy assessment and automation of free energy calculations for drug design.
    Christ CD; Fox T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 24256082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potts Hamiltonian Models and Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Simulations for Predicting the Impact of Mutations on Protein Kinase Stability.
    Thakur A; Gizzio J; Levy RM
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Feb; 128(7):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 38350894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complete L-alanine scan of neuropeptide Y reveals ligands binding to Y1 and Y2 receptors with distinguished conformations.
    Beck-Sickinger AG; Wieland HA; Wittneben H; Willim KD; Rudolf K; Jung G
    Eur J Biochem; 1994 Nov; 225(3):947-58. PubMed ID: 7957231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Large-scale application of free energy perturbation calculations for antibody design.
    Zhu F; Bourguet FA; Bennett WFD; Lau EY; Arrildt KT; Segelke BW; Zemla AT; Desautels TA; Faissol DM
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12489. PubMed ID: 35864134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.