BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31437177)

  • 1. Identification and comparison of heart-rate dynamics during cycle ergometer and treadmill exercise.
    Hunt KJ; Grunder R; Zahnd A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220826. PubMed ID: 31437177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transferability of running and cycling training zones in triathletes: implications for steady-state exercise.
    Carey DG; Tofte C; Pliego GJ; Raymond RL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 19057406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulating intensity using perceived exertion during extended exercise periods.
    Kang J; Hoffman JR; Walker H; Chaloupka EC; Utter AC
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Jun; 89(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 12712344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of energy expenditure on a treadmill vs. an elliptical device at a self-selected exercise intensity.
    Brown GA; Cook CM; Krueger RD; Heelan KA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Jun; 24(6):1643-9. PubMed ID: 20453685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metabolic responses to submaximal treadmill walking and cycle ergometer pedalling in obese adolescents.
    Lafortuna CL; Lazzer S; Agosti F; Busti C; Galli R; Mazzilli G; Sartorio A
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2010 Aug; 20(4):630-7. PubMed ID: 19706003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Higher fat oxidation during treadmill walking versus cycle ergometry in active women at equal RPE: a pilot study.
    King L; Sillers W; McCarthy K; Louis P; Astorino TA
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2016 Nov; 56(11):1298-1303. PubMed ID: 26329837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust control of heart rate for cycle ergometer exercise.
    Hunt KJ; Hurni CC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Nov; 57(11):2471-2482. PubMed ID: 31471785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heart rate and perceived exertion during self-selected intensities for exergaming compared to traditional exercise in college-age participants.
    Kraft JA; Russell WD; Bowman TA; Selsor CW; Foster GD
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1736-42. PubMed ID: 21386720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crossmodal session rating of perceived exertion response at low and moderate intensities.
    Green JM; Laurent CM; Bacon NT; Oneal EK; Davis JK; Bishop PA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1598-604. PubMed ID: 21602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metabolic and Mechanical Effects of Laddermill Graded Exercise Testing.
    Allerton TD; Earnest CP; Johannsen NM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Jan; 32(1):195-200. PubMed ID: 28135225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aerobic fitness testing in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a comparison of deep-water running with cycle ergometry.
    Cuesta-Vargas AI; Heywood S
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Dec; 90(12):1030-5. PubMed ID: 22019978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heart rate and metabolic responses to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise: a comparison of graded walking and ungraded jogging at a constant perceived exertion.
    Kilpatrick MW; Kraemer RR; Quigley EJ; Mears JL; Powers JM; Dedea AJ; Ferrer NF
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Mar; 27(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 19204846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physiological responses to treadmill and cycle exercise.
    Abrantes C; Sampaio J; Reis V; Sousa N; Duarte J
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 33(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 22052028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exercise mode and gender comparisons of energy expenditure at self-selected intensities.
    Kravitz L; Robergs RA; Heyward VH; Wagner DR; Powers K
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Aug; 29(8):1028-35. PubMed ID: 9268959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treadmill and cycle ergometry testing in 5- to 6-year-old children.
    LeMura LM; von Duvillard SP; Cohen SL; Root CJ; Chelland SA; Andreacci J; Hoover J; Weatherford J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2001 Sep; 85(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 11606017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of test modality on dynamic exercise biomarkers in children, adolescents, and young adults.
    Bar-Yoseph R; Porszasz J; Radom-Aizik S; Stehli A; Law P; Cooper DM
    Physiol Rep; 2019 Jul; 7(14):e14178. PubMed ID: 31353834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oxygen uptake, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion at the PWCVo2.
    Mielke M; Housh TJ; Hendrix CR; Camic CL; Zuniga JM; Schmidt RJ; Johnson GO
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jul; 23(4):1292-9. PubMed ID: 19528845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating oxygen uptake and energy expenditure during treadmill walking by neural network analysis of easy-to-obtain inputs.
    Beltrame T; Amelard R; Villar R; Shafiee MJ; Wong A; Hughson RL
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2016 Nov; 121(5):1226-1233. PubMed ID: 27687561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A physiological appraisal of aerobic riding in women.
    Khan S; Peters EM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Aug; 18(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 15320649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-paced exercise is less physically challenging than enforced constant pace exercise of the same intensity: influence of complex central metabolic control.
    Lander PJ; Butterly RJ; Edwards AM
    Br J Sports Med; 2009 Oct; 43(10):789-95. PubMed ID: 19196729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.