These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31437981)

  • 1. Do Medical Practitioners Trust Automated Interpretation of Electrocardiograms?
    Delrot C; Bouzillé G; Calafiore M; Rochoy M; Legrand B; Ficheur G; Chazard E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():536-540. PubMed ID: 31437981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?
    Snyder CS; Fenrich AL; Friedman RA; Macias C; O'Reilly K; Kertesz NJ
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2003; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 12457259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training and competency evaluation for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: recommendations from the American College of Physicians.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS;
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):747-50. PubMed ID: 12729430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety of Computer Interpretation of Normal Triage Electrocardiograms.
    Hughes KE; Lewis SM; Katz L; Jones J
    Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 24(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 27519772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergent cardiac outcomes in patients with normal electrocardiograms in the emergency department.
    Winters LJ; Dhillon RK; Pannu GK; Terrassa P; Holmes JF; Bing ML
    Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Jan; 51():384-387. PubMed ID: 34823195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic interpretation of electrocardiograms in population-based research: computer program research physicians, or cardiologists?
    de Bruyne MC; Kors JA; Hoes AW; Kruijssen DA; Deckers JW; Grosfeld M; van Herpen G; Grobbee DE; van Bemmel JH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Aug; 50(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 9291880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multifocal atrial arrhythmia--a frequent misdiagnosis? A correlative study using the computerized ECG.
    Varriale P; David W; Chryssos BE
    Clin Cardiol; 1992 May; 15(5):343-6. PubMed ID: 1623654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG.
    Gregg RE; Deluca DC; Chien CH; Helfenbein ED; Ariet M
    J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 22995382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-Interpreted Electrocardiograms: Benefits and Limitations.
    Schläpfer J; Wellens HJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 70(9):1183-1192. PubMed ID: 28838369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):751-60. PubMed ID: 12729431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; Brohet CR; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G; Machado H; Michaelis J
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 2233377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.
    Shah AP; Rubin SA
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Computerized ECG: Friend and Foe.
    Smulyan H
    Am J Med; 2019 Feb; 132(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 30205084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reliability study on the interpretation of electrocardiograms by general practitioners and trainees].
    Alonso Moreno FJ; Orueta Sánchez R; Segura Fragoso A; Rabadán Velasco AI; Luna Del Pozo L; Villarín Castro A; Baquero Alonso M; Rodríguez Padial L
    Semergen; 2018 Apr; 44(3):153-160. PubMed ID: 28256386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emergency physician accuracy in interpreting electrocardiograms with potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Is it enough?
    Veronese G; Germini F; Ingrassia S; Cutuli O; Donati V; Bonacchini L; Marcucci M; Fabbri A;
    Acute Card Care; 2016 Mar; 18(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 27759433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)].
    Mengden HJ; Just H; Kaspar W; Löllgen H; Kersting F
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.