95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31438245)
21. Predicting the hearing outcome in sudden sensorineural hearing loss via machine learning models.
Bing D; Ying J; Miao J; Lan L; Wang D; Zhao L; Yin Z; Yu L; Guan J; Wang Q
Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 43(3):868-874. PubMed ID: 29356346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Heuristic Machine Learning-Based Optimization Technique to Predict Lung Cancer Patient Survival.
Kukreja S; Sabharwal M; Shah MA; Gill DS
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2023; 2023():4506488. PubMed ID: 36776617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithm Utilization for Lung Cancer Classification Based on Gene Expression Levels.
Podolsky MD; Barchuk AA; Kuznetcov VI; Gusarova NF; Gaidukov VS; Tarakanov SA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(2):835-8. PubMed ID: 26925688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of machine learning to predict early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted prostatectomy.
Wong NC; Lam C; Patterson L; Shayegan B
BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 29969172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Patient-Reported Outcome(PRO)to Measure Health-Related QOL in Lung Cancer Patients].
Sone S; Hase K; Takezaki A; Kakiuchi S; Konaka K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2019 Jun; 46(6):974-980. PubMed ID: 31273159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spatially varying effects of predictors for the survival prediction of nonmetastatic colorectal Cancer.
Tian Y; Li J; Zhou T; Tong D; Chi S; Kong X; Ding K; Li J
BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1084. PubMed ID: 30409119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Similarity-based machine learning support vector machine predictor of drug-drug interactions with improved accuracies.
Song D; Chen Y; Min Q; Sun Q; Ye K; Zhou C; Yuan S; Sun Z; Liao J
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2019 Apr; 44(2):268-275. PubMed ID: 30565313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards.
Churpek MM; Yuen TC; Winslow C; Meltzer DO; Kattan MW; Edelson DP
Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 26771782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict all-cause mortality using fitness data: the Henry ford exercIse testing (FIT) project.
Sakr S; Elshawi R; Ahmed AM; Qureshi WT; Brawner CA; Keteyian SJ; Blaha MJ; Al-Mallah MH
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):174. PubMed ID: 29258510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Exploratory analysis using machine learning to predict for chest wall pain in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Chao HH; Valdes G; Luna JM; Heskel M; Berman AT; Solberg TD; Simone CB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):539-546. PubMed ID: 29992732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Novel Breast Imaging and Machine Learning: Predicting Breast Lesion Malignancy at Cone-Beam CT Using Machine Learning Techniques.
Uhlig J; Uhlig A; Kunze M; Beissbarth T; Fischer U; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):W123-W131. PubMed ID: 29792725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predicting diabetes mellitus using SMOTE and ensemble machine learning approach: The Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) project.
Alghamdi M; Al-Mallah M; Keteyian S; Brawner C; Ehrman J; Sakr S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179805. PubMed ID: 28738059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of Survivorship Care Plans and Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multinational Patients With Lung Cancer.
Berman AT; DeCesaris CM; Simone CB; Vachani C; DiLullo G; Hampshire MK; Metz J; Hill-Kayser C
J Oncol Pract; 2016 May; 12(5):e527-35. PubMed ID: 27048615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Using patient-reported outcome measures to deliver enhanced supportive care to people with lung cancer: feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led consultation model.
Kotronoulas G; Papadopoulou C; Simpson MF; McPhelim J; Mack L; Maguire R
Support Care Cancer; 2018 Nov; 26(11):3729-3737. PubMed ID: 29779057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of sepsis patients using machine learning approach: A meta-analysis.
Islam MM; Nasrin T; Walther BA; Wu CC; Yang HC; Li YC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Mar; 170():1-9. PubMed ID: 30712598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of monitor units for a compact proton machine.
Sun B; Lam D; Yang D; Grantham K; Zhang T; Mutic S; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2243-2251. PubMed ID: 29500818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparison of machine learning method and logistic regression model in prediction of acute kidney injury in severely burned patients].
Tang CQ; Li JQ; Xu DY; Liu XB; Hou WJ; Lyu KY; Xiao SC; Xia ZF
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 34(6):343-348. PubMed ID: 29961290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting Depression Among Community Residing Older Adults: A Use of Machine Learning Approch.
Choi J; Choi J; Choi WJ
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 250():265. PubMed ID: 29857458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of artificial intelligence in the care of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.
Rabbani M; Kanevsky J; Kafi K; Chandelier F; Giles FJ
Eur J Clin Invest; 2018 Apr; 48(4):. PubMed ID: 29405289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fetal health status prediction based on maternal clinical history using machine learning techniques.
Akbulut A; Ertugrul E; Topcu V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():87-100. PubMed ID: 30119860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
