These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31438734)

  • 1. Intrasession Repeatability of Biometric Measurements Obtained with a Low-Coherence Interferometry System in Pseudophakic Eyes.
    Fukumitsu H; Camps VJ; Piñero DP
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):221-226. PubMed ID: 31438734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ocular measurements of a swept-source biometer: Repeatability data and comparison with an optical low-coherence interferometry biometer.
    Nemeth G; Modis L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):789-797. PubMed ID: 30850124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
    Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
    Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Precision of a new device for biometric measurements in pseudophakic eyes].
    Hildebrandt AL; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    Ophthalmologe; 2011 Aug; 108(8):739-44. PubMed ID: 21607812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
    Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Split-Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes.
    Sikorski BL; Hoffer KJ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 100(8):e1685-e1690. PubMed ID: 35670319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy.
    Zhang Q; Jin W; Wang Q
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 36(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 20494765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.
    Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.
    Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
    Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation.
    Hui S; Yi L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 62(9):931-4. PubMed ID: 25370395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes.
    Luft N; Hirnschall N; Farrokhi S; Findl O
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1678-84. PubMed ID: 26432125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior chamber depth measurement in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.
    Su PF; Lo AY; Hu CY; Chang SW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1193-200. PubMed ID: 19050474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.