318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31439233)
1. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.
Rosenkrantz AB; Sigmund EE; Johnson G; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Lee VS; Jensen JH
Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22550312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.
Barrett T; McLean M; Priest AN; Lawrence EM; Patterson AJ; Koo BC; Patterson I; Warren AY; Doble A; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Gallagher FA
Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 29222677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of mono-exponential, bi-exponential, kurtosis, and fractional-order calculus models of diffusion-weighted imaging in characterizing prostate lesions in transition zone.
Liu G; Lu Y; Dai Y; Xue K; Yi Y; Xu J; Wu D; Wu G
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jun; 46(6):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 33388809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the Transition Zone by diffusion-weighted MRI.
Bao J; Wang X; Hu C; Hou J; Dong F; Guo L
Eur J Radiol Open; 2017; 4():123-128. PubMed ID: 29034282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Triexponential function analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer.
Ueda Y; Takahashi S; Ohno N; Kyotani K; Kawamitu H; Miyati T; Aoyama N; Ueno Y; Kitajima K; Kawakami F; Okuaki T; Tsukamoto R; Yanagita E; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 26119033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models.
Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28394755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between T2 relaxation and apparent diffusion coefficient in malignant and non-malignant prostate regions and the effect of peripheral zone fractional volume.
Simpkin CJ; Morgan VA; Giles SL; Riches SF; Parker C; deSouza NM
Br J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 86(1024):20120469. PubMed ID: 23426849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. T1 Mapping of the Prostate Using Single-Shot T1FLASH: A Clinical Feasibility Study to Optimize Prostate Cancer Assessment.
Al-Bourini O; Seif Amir Hosseini A; Giganti F; Balz J; Heitz LG; Voit D; Lotz J; Trojan L; Frahm J; Uhlig A; Uhlig J
Invest Radiol; 2023 Jun; 58(6):380-387. PubMed ID: 36729865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer.
Wang Q; Li H; Yan X; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB; Zhang YD
Urol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):337.e15-24. PubMed ID: 26048104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.
Tamura C; Shinmoto H; Soga S; Okamura T; Sato H; Okuaki T; Pang Y; Kosuda S; Kaji T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 40(3):723-9. PubMed ID: 24924835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer].
Wen R; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of fitting models for prostate tissue characterization using extended-range b-factor diffusion-weighted imaging.
Langkilde F; Kobus T; Fedorov A; Dunne R; Tempany C; Mulkern RV; Maier SE
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):2346-2358. PubMed ID: 28718517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: A Preliminary Investigation on Screening with Ultrahigh B-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as an Innovative Diagnostic Biomarker.
Zhang K; Shen Y; Zhang X; Ma L; Wang H; An N; Guo A; Ye H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151176. PubMed ID: 26963936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. T2* relaxation time in the detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer in comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Wu LM; Zhou B; Lu Q; Suo ST; Liu Q; Hu J; Haccke EM; Chen XX; Xu JR
Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 26823021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
