BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31441886)

  • 21. Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis.
    Yan S; Liu Z; Yu S; Bao Y
    Med Sci Monit; 2016 Sep; 22():3409-3418. PubMed ID: 27665580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The diagnostic accuracy of a real-time optoelectronic device in cervical cancer screening: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang H; Zhang X; Hao Z
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11439. PubMed ID: 30024517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Potential diagnostic value of serum p53 antibody for detecting colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Meng R; Wang Y; He L; He Y; Du Z
    Oncol Lett; 2018 Apr; 15(4):5489-5496. PubMed ID: 29556296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aberrant methylation of genes in stool samples as diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer or adenomas: a meta-analysis.
    Luo YX; Chen DK; Song SX; Wang L; Wang JP
    Int J Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 65(12):1313-20. PubMed ID: 22093539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnosis and prognosis of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for acute kidney injury with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang A; Cai Y; Wang PF; Qu JN; Luo ZC; Chen XD; Huang B; Liu Y; Huang WQ; Wu J; Yin YH
    Crit Care; 2016 Feb; 20():41. PubMed ID: 26880194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Piper MA; Perdue LA; Rutter CM; Webber EM; O'Connor E; Smith N; Whitlock EP
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2576-94. PubMed ID: 27305422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The diagnostic accuracy of circulating free DNA for the detection of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Xie W; Xie L; Song X
    Cancer Med; 2019 Mar; 8(3):1218-1231. PubMed ID: 30791218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal occult blood tests show lower colorectal cancer detection rates in the proximal colon in colonoscopy-verified diagnostic studies.
    Hirai HW; Tsoi KK; Chan JY; Wong SH; Ching JY; Wong MC; Wu JC; Chan FK; Sung JJ; Ng SC
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2016 Apr; 43(7):755-64. PubMed ID: 26858128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The importance of stool DNA methylation in colorectal cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis.
    Mojtabanezhad Shariatpanahi A; Yassi M; Nouraie M; Sahebkar A; Varshoee Tabrizi F; Kerachian MA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200735. PubMed ID: 30024936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Limited diagnostic value of microRNAs for detecting colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Zhou XJ; Dong ZG; Yang YM; Du LT; Zhang X; Wang CX
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(8):4699-704. PubMed ID: 24083729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Li RD; Guan M; Zhou Z; Dong SX; Liu Q
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():766208. PubMed ID: 34869475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predictive power of circulating miRNAs in detecting colorectal cancer.
    Zeng W; Tu Y; Zhu Y; Wang Z; Li C; Lao L; Wu G
    Tumour Biol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):2559-67. PubMed ID: 25527153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The accuracy of circulating microRNA-21 in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xu F; Xu L; Wang M; An G; Feng G
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 May; 17(5):O100-7. PubMed ID: 25683351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High-risk symptoms and quantitative faecal immunochemical test accuracy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pin Vieito N; Zarraquiños S; Cubiella J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 May; 25(19):2383-2401. PubMed ID: 31148909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Significance of Serum Pepsinogens as a Biomarker for Gastric Cancer and Atrophic Gastritis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Huang YK; Yu JC; Kang WM; Ma ZQ; Ye X; Tian SB; Yan C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142080. PubMed ID: 26556485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance versus computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sun S; Yang C; Huang Z; Jiang W; Liu Y; Wu H; Zhao J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(22):e10883. PubMed ID: 29851808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in preeclampsia: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zheng WF; Zhan J; Chen A; Ma H; Yang H; Maharjan R
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(51):e18496. PubMed ID: 31861035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume as potential biomarkers for early detection and monitoring of colorectal adenocarcinoma.
    Kilincalp S; Çoban Ş; Akinci H; Hamamcı M; Karaahmet F; Coşkun Y; Üstün Y; Şimşek Z; Erarslan E; Yüksel İ
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2015 Jul; 24(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 25304028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic value of fecal tumor M2-pyruvate kinase for CRC screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li R; Liu J; Xue H; Huang G
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Oct; 131(8):1837-45. PubMed ID: 22261915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Colorectal cancer and adenoma screening using urinary volatile organic compound (VOC) detection: early results from a single-centre bowel screening population (UK BCSP).
    Mozdiak E; Wicaksono AN; Covington JA; Arasaradnam RP
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Apr; 23(4):343-351. PubMed ID: 30989415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.