227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31442891)
1. Distinct immune response profile during rhipicephalus (boophilus) microplus infestations of guzerat dairy herd according to the maternal lineage ancestry (mitochondrial DNA).
de Araújo FF; Ronda JB; Bittar ER; Venturini GC; Garcia GC; Martins-Filho OA; Silva Araújo MS; Figueiredo Bittar JF
Vet Parasitol; 2019 Sep; 273():36-44. PubMed ID: 31442891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
Franzin AM; Maruyama SR; Garcia GR; Oliveira RP; Ribeiro JM; Bishop R; Maia AA; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; Santos IK
Parasit Vectors; 2017 Jan; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 28143523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microarray analysis of tick-infested skin in resistant and susceptible cattle confirms the role of inflammatory pathways in immune activation and larval rejection.
Carvalho WA; Domingues R; de Azevedo Prata MC; da Silva MV; de Oliveira GC; Guimarães SE; Machado MA
Vet Parasitol; 2014 Sep; 205(1-2):307-17. PubMed ID: 25108850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle.
Constantinoiu CC; Jackson LA; Jorgensen WK; Lew-Tabor AE; Piper EK; Mayer DG; Venus B; Jonsson NN
Int J Parasitol; 2010 Jun; 40(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 20109460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: distinct acute phase proteins vary during infestations according to the genetic composition of the bovine hosts, Bos taurus and Bos indicus.
Carvalho WA; Bechara GH; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; da Silva JS; de Miranda Santos IK
Exp Parasitol; 2008 Apr; 118(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 18171576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the differential regulation of T and B-lymphocyte subsets in the skin and lymph nodes amongst three cattle breeds as potential mediators of immune-resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus.
Robbertse L; Richards SA; Clift SJ; Barnard AC; Leisewitz A; Crafford JE; Maritz-Olivier C
Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2018 May; 9(4):976-987. PubMed ID: 29622516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immunological profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
Piper EK; Jonsson NN; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Moolhuijzen P; Vance ME; Jackson LA
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):1074-86. PubMed ID: 19474263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle.
Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bielefeldt-Ohmann H; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Jonsson NN
Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19852965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immune recognition of salivary proteins from the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus differs according to the genotype of the bovine host.
Garcia GR; Maruyama SR; Nelson KT; Ribeiro JM; Gardinassi LG; Maia AA; Ferreira BR; Kooyman FN; de Miranda Santos IK
Parasit Vectors; 2017 Mar; 10(1):144. PubMed ID: 28288696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
Jonsson NN; Piper EK; Constantinoiu CC
Parasite Immunol; 2014 Nov; 36(11):553-9. PubMed ID: 25313455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene Expression in the Salivary Gland of
Giachetto PF; Cunha RC; Nhani A; Garcia MV; Ferro JA; Andreotti R
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():477. PubMed ID: 32039052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modulation of cutaneous inflammation induced by ticks in contrasting phenotypes of infestation in bovines.
Carvalho WA; Franzin AM; Abatepaulo AR; de Oliveira CJ; Moré DD; da Silva JS; Ferreira BR; de Miranda Santos IK
Vet Parasitol; 2010 Feb; 167(2-4):260-73. PubMed ID: 19836891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cellular response in the tick feeding site in crossbred cattle artificially infested by Rhipicephalus microplus.
Engracia Filho JR; Araújo CD; Pinto GN; Mendes YH; Bechara GH
Exp Appl Acarol; 2017 Jun; 72(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 28597313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rhipicephalus microplus lipocalins (LRMs): genomic identification and analysis of the bovine immune response using in silico predicted B and T cell epitopes.
Rodriguez-Valle M; Moolhuijzen P; Piper EK; Weiss O; Vance M; Bellgard M; Lew-Tabor A
Int J Parasitol; 2013 Aug; 43(9):739-52. PubMed ID: 23747800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cattle Tick
Tabor AE; Ali A; Rehman G; Rocha Garcia G; Zangirolamo AF; Malardo T; Jonsson NN
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2017; 7():506. PubMed ID: 29322033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between the resistance of crossbred cattle to ticks, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) and Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum (Koch, 1844).
Miranpuri GS
Vet Parasitol; 1989 Jun; 31(3-4):289-301. PubMed ID: 2763448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of SNPs in bovine immune-response genes that may mediate resistance to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
Abatepaulo AR; Caetano AR; Mendes CT; Carvalho WA; Ferreira BR; de Miranda Santos IK
Anim Genet; 2008 Jun; 39(3):328-9. PubMed ID: 18371125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Gene expression in the skin of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bagnall NH; Kongsuwan KK; Lew AE; Jonsson NN
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2008 Nov; 126(1-2):110-9. PubMed ID: 18676027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunoprotective potential of a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus metalloprotease.
Ali A; Parizi LF; Guizzo MG; Tirloni L; Seixas A; Vaz Ida S; Termignoni C
Vet Parasitol; 2015 Jan; 207(1-2):107-14. PubMed ID: 25480468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunogenetic influences on tick resistance in African cattle with particular reference to trypanotolerant N'Dama (Bos taurus) and trypanosusceptible Gobra zebu (Bos indicus) cattle.
Mattioli RC; Pandey VS; Murray M; Fitzpatrick JL
Acta Trop; 2000 May; 75(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 10838210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
