156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31443634)
1. Target-small decoy search strategy for false discovery rate estimation.
Kim H; Lee S; Park H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Aug; 20(1):438. PubMed ID: 31443634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. False discovery rate estimation using candidate peptides for each spectrum.
Lee S; Park H; Kim H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 36319948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
Wang G; Wu WW; Zhang Z; Masilamani S; Shen RF
Anal Chem; 2009 Jan; 81(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 19061407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms.
Colaert N; Degroeve S; Helsens K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5555-61. PubMed ID: 21995378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat-Preserving Decoy Database for False Discovery Rate Estimation in Peptide Identification.
Moosa JM; Guan S; Moran MF; Ma B
J Proteome Res; 2020 Mar; 19(3):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 32009416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the effect of database inflation in proteogenomic search on sensitive and reliable peptide identification.
Li H; Joh YS; Kim H; Paek E; Lee SW; Hwang KB
BMC Genomics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 13):1031. PubMed ID: 28155652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reverse and Random Decoy Methods for False Discovery Rate Estimation in High Mass Accuracy Peptide Spectral Library Searches.
Zhang Z; Burke M; Mirokhin YA; Tchekhovskoi DV; Markey SP; Yu W; Chaerkady R; Hess S; Stein SE
J Proteome Res; 2018 Feb; 17(2):846-857. PubMed ID: 29281288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-dimensional target decoy strategy for shotgun proteomics.
Bern MW; Kil YJ
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5296-301. PubMed ID: 22010998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of false-discovery rates of various decoy databases.
Lee S; Park H; Kim H
Proteome Sci; 2021 Sep; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 34537052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics.
Keich U; Kertesz-Farkas A; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2015 Aug; 14(8):3148-61. PubMed ID: 26152888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling Lower-Order Statistics to Enable Decoy-Free FDR Estimation in Proteomics.
Madej D; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2023 Apr; 22(4):1159-1171. PubMed ID: 36962508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry proteomics.
Peng Y; Jain S; Li YF; Greguš M; Ivanov AR; Vitek O; Radivojac P
Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(Suppl_2):i745-i753. PubMed ID: 33381824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptation of Decoy Fusion Strategy for Existing Multi-Stage Search Workflows.
Ivanov MV; Levitsky LI; Gorshkov MV
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1579-82. PubMed ID: 27349255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False discovery rate: the Achilles' heel of proteogenomics.
Aggarwal S; Raj A; Kumar D; Dash D; Yadav AK
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35534181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the entrapment sequence method as a standard to evaluate key steps of proteomics data analysis process.
Feng XD; Li LW; Zhang JH; Zhu YP; Chang C; Shu KX; Ma J
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 2):143. PubMed ID: 28361671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different variant sequence types coupled with decoy generation methods used in concatenated target-decoy database searches for proteogenomic research.
Choong WK; Sung TY
J Proteomics; 2021 Jan; 231():104021. PubMed ID: 33148401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. False Discovery Rate Estimation for Hybrid Mass Spectral Library Search Identifications in Bottom-up Proteomics.
Burke MC; Zhang Z; Mirokhin YA; Tchekovskoi DV; Liang Y; Stein SE
J Proteome Res; 2019 Sep; 18(9):3223-3234. PubMed ID: 31364354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrated Proteomic Pipeline Using Multiple Search Engines for a Proteogenomic Study with a Controlled Protein False Discovery Rate.
Park GW; Hwang H; Kim KH; Lee JY; Lee HK; Park JY; Ji ES; Park SR; Yates JR; Kwon KH; Park YM; Lee HJ; Paik YK; Kim JY; Yoo JS
J Proteome Res; 2016 Nov; 15(11):4082-4090. PubMed ID: 27537616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unbiased False Discovery Rate Estimation for Shotgun Proteomics Based on the Target-Decoy Approach.
Levitsky LI; Ivanov MV; Lobas AA; Gorshkov MV
J Proteome Res; 2017 Feb; 16(2):393-397. PubMed ID: 27959540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
