These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31444148)
1. Reliability of Observational Assessment Methods for Outcome-based Assessment of Surgical Skill: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Groenier M; Brummer L; Bunting BP; Gallagher AG J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):189-201. PubMed ID: 31444148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Ilgen JS; Ma IW; Hatala R; Cook DA Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 49(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 25626747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Generalizability Theory for Exploring Reliability of and Sources of Variance in Assessment of Technical Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Andersen SAW; Nayahangan LJ; Park YS; Konge L Acad Med; 2021 Nov; 96(11):1609-1619. PubMed ID: 33951677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of outcome measurement instruments and staging systems used in hidradenitis suppurativa. Thorlacius L; Garg A; Riis PT; Nielsen SM; Bettoli V; Ingram JR; Del Marmol V; Matusiak L; Pascual JC; Revuz J; Sartorius K; Tzellos T; van der Zee HH; Zouboulis CC; Saunte DM; Gottlieb AB; Christensen R; Jemec GBE Br J Dermatol; 2019 Sep; 181(3):483-491. PubMed ID: 30724351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies. Barth J; de Boer WE; Busse JW; Hoving JL; Kedzia S; Couban R; Fischer K; von Allmen DY; Spanjer J; Kunz R BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():j14. PubMed ID: 28122727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and evaluation of the General Surgery Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (GOSATS). Halwani Y; Sachdeva AK; Satterthwaite L; de Montbrun S Br J Surg; 2019 Nov; 106(12):1617-1622. PubMed ID: 31588561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Global Rating Scales for the Assessment of Arthroscopic Surgical Skills: A Systematic Review. Velazquez-Pimentel D; Stewart E; Trockels A; Achan P; Akhtar K; Vaghela KR Arthroscopy; 2020 Apr; 36(4):1156-1173. PubMed ID: 31948719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Mohammed Vashist N; Samaan M; Mosli MH; Parker CE; MacDonald JK; Nelson SA; Zou GY; Feagan BG; Khanna R; Jairath V Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD011450. PubMed ID: 29338066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a cast application simulator and evaluation of objective measures of performance. Moktar J; Popkin CA; Howard A; Murnaghan ML J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(9):e76. PubMed ID: 24806022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-stakes assessment of the non-technical skills of critical care trainees using simulation: feasibility, acceptability and reliability. Nunnink L; Foot C; Venkatesh B; Corke C; Saxena M; Lucey M; Jones M Crit Care Resusc; 2014 Mar; 16(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 24588430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing and Evaluating a National Certification Technical Skills Examination: The Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill. de Montbrun S; Roberts PL; Satterthwaite L; MacRae H Ann Surg; 2016 Jul; 264(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26764869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review. Ahmed K; Miskovic D; Darzi A; Athanasiou T; Hanna GB Am J Surg; 2011 Oct; 202(4):469-480.e6. PubMed ID: 21798511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology. Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Global assessment of surgical skills (GASS): validation of a new instrument to measure global technical safety in surgical procedures. Nau P; Worden E; Lehmann R; Kleppe K; Mancini GJ; Mancini ML; Ramshaw B Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7964-7969. PubMed ID: 37442836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and validity of three quality rating instruments for systematic reviews of observational studies. Hootman JM; Driban JB; Sitler MR; Harris KP; Cattano NM Res Synth Methods; 2011 Jun; 2(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 26061679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers. Pieper D; Jacobs A; Weikert B; Fishta A; Wegewitz U BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):98. PubMed ID: 28693497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Surgical Safety Checklist and Teamwork Coaching Tools: a study of inter-rater reliability. Huang LC; Conley D; Lipsitz S; Wright CC; Diller TW; Edmondson L; Berry WR; Singer SJ BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Aug; 23(8):639-50. PubMed ID: 24497526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and Reliability of Field-Based Measures for Assessing Movement Skill Competency in Lifelong Physical Activities: A Systematic Review. Hulteen RM; Lander NJ; Morgan PJ; Barnett LM; Robertson SJ; Lubans DR Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 45(10):1443-54. PubMed ID: 26173900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]