228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31444148)
1. Reliability of Observational Assessment Methods for Outcome-based Assessment of Surgical Skill: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.
Groenier M; Brummer L; Bunting BP; Gallagher AG
J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):189-201. PubMed ID: 31444148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment.
Ilgen JS; Ma IW; Hatala R; Cook DA
Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 49(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 25626747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Generalizability Theory for Exploring Reliability of and Sources of Variance in Assessment of Technical Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Andersen SAW; Nayahangan LJ; Park YS; Konge L
Acad Med; 2021 Nov; 96(11):1609-1619. PubMed ID: 33951677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of outcome measurement instruments and staging systems used in hidradenitis suppurativa.
Thorlacius L; Garg A; Riis PT; Nielsen SM; Bettoli V; Ingram JR; Del Marmol V; Matusiak L; Pascual JC; Revuz J; Sartorius K; Tzellos T; van der Zee HH; Zouboulis CC; Saunte DM; Gottlieb AB; Christensen R; Jemec GBE
Br J Dermatol; 2019 Sep; 181(3):483-491. PubMed ID: 30724351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies.
Barth J; de Boer WE; Busse JW; Hoving JL; Kedzia S; Couban R; Fischer K; von Allmen DY; Spanjer J; Kunz R
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():j14. PubMed ID: 28122727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and evaluation of the General Surgery Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (GOSATS).
Halwani Y; Sachdeva AK; Satterthwaite L; de Montbrun S
Br J Surg; 2019 Nov; 106(12):1617-1622. PubMed ID: 31588561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Global Rating Scales for the Assessment of Arthroscopic Surgical Skills: A Systematic Review.
Velazquez-Pimentel D; Stewart E; Trockels A; Achan P; Akhtar K; Vaghela KR
Arthroscopy; 2020 Apr; 36(4):1156-1173. PubMed ID: 31948719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.
Mohammed Vashist N; Samaan M; Mosli MH; Parker CE; MacDonald JK; Nelson SA; Zou GY; Feagan BG; Khanna R; Jairath V
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD011450. PubMed ID: 29338066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a cast application simulator and evaluation of objective measures of performance.
Moktar J; Popkin CA; Howard A; Murnaghan ML
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(9):e76. PubMed ID: 24806022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-stakes assessment of the non-technical skills of critical care trainees using simulation: feasibility, acceptability and reliability.
Nunnink L; Foot C; Venkatesh B; Corke C; Saxena M; Lucey M; Jones M
Crit Care Resusc; 2014 Mar; 16(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 24588430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing and Evaluating a National Certification Technical Skills Examination: The Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill.
de Montbrun S; Roberts PL; Satterthwaite L; MacRae H
Ann Surg; 2016 Jul; 264(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26764869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review.
Ahmed K; Miskovic D; Darzi A; Athanasiou T; Hanna GB
Am J Surg; 2011 Oct; 202(4):469-480.e6. PubMed ID: 21798511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Global assessment of surgical skills (GASS): validation of a new instrument to measure global technical safety in surgical procedures.
Nau P; Worden E; Lehmann R; Kleppe K; Mancini GJ; Mancini ML; Ramshaw B
Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7964-7969. PubMed ID: 37442836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and validity of three quality rating instruments for systematic reviews of observational studies.
Hootman JM; Driban JB; Sitler MR; Harris KP; Cattano NM
Res Synth Methods; 2011 Jun; 2(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 26061679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers.
Pieper D; Jacobs A; Weikert B; Fishta A; Wegewitz U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):98. PubMed ID: 28693497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Surgical Safety Checklist and Teamwork Coaching Tools: a study of inter-rater reliability.
Huang LC; Conley D; Lipsitz S; Wright CC; Diller TW; Edmondson L; Berry WR; Singer SJ
BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Aug; 23(8):639-50. PubMed ID: 24497526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and Reliability of Field-Based Measures for Assessing Movement Skill Competency in Lifelong Physical Activities: A Systematic Review.
Hulteen RM; Lander NJ; Morgan PJ; Barnett LM; Robertson SJ; Lubans DR
Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 45(10):1443-54. PubMed ID: 26173900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tackling technical skills competency: a surgical skills rating tool.
Wade TJ; Webb TP
J Surg Res; 2013 May; 181(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22703983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
