221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31444283)
1. Live imaging the foreign body response in zebrafish reveals how dampening inflammation reduces fibrosis.
Gurevich DB; French KE; Collin JD; Cross SJ; Martin P
J Cell Sci; 2019 Sep; 133(5):. PubMed ID: 31444283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrastructural aspects of foreign body giant cells generated on different substrates.
Ten Harkel B; Koopsen J; van Putten SM; van Veen H; Picavet DI; de Vries TJ; Bank RA; Everts V
J Struct Biol; 2016 Jul; 195(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 27155321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Implant-Induced Foreign Body Response Is Limited by CD13-Dependent Regulation of Ubiquitination of Fusogenic Proteins.
Ghosh M; McGurk F; Norris R; Dong A; Nair S; Jellison E; Murphy P; Verma R; Shapiro LH
J Immunol; 2024 Feb; 212(4):663-676. PubMed ID: 38149920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time course study of long-term biocompatibility and foreign body reaction to intraneural polyimide-based implants.
de la Oliva N; Navarro X; Del Valle J
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Mar; 106(3):746-757. PubMed ID: 29052368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 Is Required for Foreign Body Response and Giant Cell Formation.
Goswami R; Arya RK; Biswas D; Zhu X; Rahaman SO
Am J Pathol; 2019 Aug; 189(8):1505-1512. PubMed ID: 31121133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inflammation via myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 signaling mediates the fibrotic response to implantable synthetic poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels.
Amer LD; Saleh LS; Walker C; Thomas S; Janssen WJ; Alper S; Bryant SJ
Acta Biomater; 2019 Dec; 100():105-117. PubMed ID: 31568879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Foreign body response to subcutaneous biomaterial implants in a mast cell-deficient Kit(w-Sh) murine model.
Avula MN; Rao AN; McGill LD; Grainger DW; Solzbacher F
Acta Biomater; 2014 May; 10(5):1856-63. PubMed ID: 24406200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Localized immunosuppressive environment in the foreign body response to implanted biomaterials.
Higgins DM; Basaraba RJ; Hohnbaum AC; Lee EJ; Grainger DW; Gonzalez-Juarrero M
Am J Pathol; 2009 Jul; 175(1):161-70. PubMed ID: 19528351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Macrophage reaction against biomaterials in the mouse model - Phenotypes, functions and markers.
Klopfleisch R
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 43():3-13. PubMed ID: 27395828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials.
Klopfleisch R; Jung F
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2017 Mar; 105(3):927-940. PubMed ID: 27813288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decoding the "Fingerprint" of Implant Materials: Insights into the Foreign Body Reaction.
Chen Y; Luo Z; Meng W; Liu K; Chen Q; Cai Y; Ding Z; Huang C; Zhou Z; Jiang M; Zhou L
Small; 2024 Jun; 20(23):e2310325. PubMed ID: 38191783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Foreign Body Reaction to Biomaterials: On Mechanisms for Buildup and Breakdown of Osseointegration.
Trindade R; Albrektsson T; Tengvall P; Wennerberg A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 25257971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomaterial Design Inspired by Regenerative Research Organisms.
Sapru S; Dill MN; Simmons CS
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2023 Jul; 9(7):3860-3876. PubMed ID: 36222692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling.
Junge K; Binnebösel M; von Trotha KT; Rosch R; Klinge U; Neumann UP; Lynen Jansen P
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2012 Feb; 397(2):255-70. PubMed ID: 21455703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.
Anderson JM; Rodriguez A; Chang DT
Semin Immunol; 2008 Apr; 20(2):86-100. PubMed ID: 18162407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Macrophage fusion leading to foreign body giant cell formation persists under phagocytic stimulation by microspheres in vitro and in vivo in mouse models.
Jay SM; Skokos EA; Zeng J; Knox K; Kyriakides TR
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Apr; 93(1):189-99. PubMed ID: 19536825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Foreign body response to synthetic polymer biomaterials and the role of adaptive immunity.
Kyriakides TR; Kim HJ; Zheng C; Harkins L; Tao W; Deschenes E
Biomed Mater; 2022 Mar; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 35168213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inflammasome components Asc and caspase-1 mediate biomaterial-induced inflammation and foreign body response.
Malik AF; Hoque R; Ouyang X; Ghani A; Hong E; Khan K; Moore LB; Ng G; Munro F; Flavell RA; Shi Y; Kyriakides TR; Mehal WZ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Dec; 108(50):20095-100. PubMed ID: 22109549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Foreign body reaction associated with PET and PET/chitosan electrospun nanofibrous abdominal meshes.
Veleirinho B; Coelho DS; Dias PF; Maraschin M; Pinto R; Cargnin-Ferreira E; Peixoto A; Souza JA; Ribeiro-do-Valle RM; Lopes-da-Silva JA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95293. PubMed ID: 24740104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foreign body reaction in glaucoma drainage implant surgery.
Jung KI; Lee SB; Kim JH; Park CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):3957-64. PubMed ID: 23674756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
