301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31444952)
1. Evaluation of a simplified optimizer for MR-guided adaptive RT in case of pancreatic cancer.
Cusumano D; Boldrini L; Menna S; Teodoli S; Placidi E; Chiloiro G; Placidi L; Greco F; Stimato G; Cellini F; Valentini V; Azario L; De Spirito M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 20(9):20-30. PubMed ID: 31444952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR.
Choi CH; Kim JH; Kim JI; Park JM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220039. PubMed ID: 31329641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative planning study for lung SABR between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system and volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park JM; Park SY; Kim HJ; Wu HG; Carlson J; Kim JI
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Aug; 120(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 27401404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of treatment planning workflow and tumor coverage during daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) of pancreatic cancer.
Olberg S; Green O; Cai B; Yang D; Rodriguez V; Zhang H; Kim JS; Parikh PJ; Mutic S; Park JC
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Mar; 13(1):51. PubMed ID: 29573744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Treatment Plans Between 1.5T MR-Linac and Conventional Linac.
Ding S; Li Y; Liu H; Li R; Wang B; Zhang J; Chen Y; Huang X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():1533033820985871. PubMed ID: 33472549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of margin reduction on radiation dose distribution of ultra-hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy utilizing a 1.5-T MR-Linac.
Onal C; Efe E; Bozca R; Yavas C; Yavas G; Arslan G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14179. PubMed ID: 38013636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of treatment plans between IMRT with MR-linac and VMAT for lung SABR.
Park JM; Wu HG; Kim HJ; Choi CH; Kim JI
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):105. PubMed ID: 31196120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans Using a ⁶⁰Co Magnetic Resonance Image Guidance Radiation Therapy System.
Wooten HO; Green O; Yang M; DeWees T; Kashani R; Olsen J; Michalski J; Yang D; Tanderup K; Hu Y; Li HH; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 26104932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Qiu J; Lv B; Fu M; Wang X; Zheng X; Zhuo W
Head Neck; 2017 Dec; 39(12):2519-2527. PubMed ID: 28963789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric study for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: magnetic resonance guided linear accelerator versus volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Yadav P; Musunuru HB; Witt JS; Bassetti M; Bayouth J; Baschnagel AM
Radiol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 53(3):362-368. PubMed ID: 31553704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for distal esophageal cancer.
Barsky AR; George J; Wroe AJ; Mittauer KE; Kaiser A; Herrera R; Yu J; Gutierrez AN; Alvarez D; McCulloch J; Kasper ME; Mehta MP; Chuong MD
Med Dosim; 2024 Summer; 49(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 38001010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment plan quality during online adaptive re-planning.
van Timmeren JE; Chamberlain M; Krayenbuehl J; Wilke L; Ehrbar S; Bogowicz M; Hartley C; Zamburlini M; Andratschke N; Garcia Schüler H; Pavic M; Balermpas P; Ryu C; Guckenberger M; Tanadini-Lang S
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Aug; 15(1):203. PubMed ID: 32825848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.
Zhang S; Yang R; Wang X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):104-110. PubMed ID: 31580532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduction of cardiac dose using respiratory-gated MR-linac plans for gastro-esophageal junction cancer.
Lee SL; Mahler P; Olson S; Witt JS; Musunuru HB; Rajamanickam V; Bassetti MF; Yadav P
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):152-156. PubMed ID: 33097372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive Comparison of Progressive Optimization Algorithm Based Automatic Plan and Manually Planned Treatment Technique for Cervical-Thoracic Esophageal Cancers.
Zhou Y; Xiang X; Xiong J; Gong C
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820973283. PubMed ID: 33176589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in accumulated dose of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for pancreatic cancer due to different beam starting phases.
Sasaki M; Nakamura M; Mukumoto N; Goto Y; Ishihara Y; Nakata M; Sugimoto N; Mizowaki T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):118-126. PubMed ID: 31539194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of treatment plans for a high-field MRI-linac and a conventional linac for esophageal cancer.
Nachbar M; Mönnich D; Kalwa P; Zips D; Thorwarth D; Gani C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Apr; 195(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 30361744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac Dose Control and Optimization Strategy for Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy With Non-Uniform VMAT Technology.
Qiu J; Zhang S; Lv B; Zheng X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211053752. PubMed ID: 34806481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
