356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31445435)
21. Isotope approach to assess hydrologic connections during Marcellus Shale drilling.
Sharma S; Mulder ML; Sack A; Schroeder K; Hammack R
Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):424-33. PubMed ID: 23772970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modeling of Methane Migration in Shallow Aquifers from Shale Gas Well Drilling.
Zhang L; Soeder DJ
Ground Water; 2016 May; 54(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26280927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Saline and hydrocarbon-bearing fluids detected in shallow aquifers of southern New Brunswick, Canada: Natural occurrence, or deep migration along faults and industrial wellbores?
Bordeleau G; Lavoie D; Rivard C; Pinet N; Barton D; Hinds S; Al T
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 933():172999. PubMed ID: 38714261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales.
Darrah TH; Vengosh A; Jackson RB; Warner NR; Poreda RJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111(39):14076-81. PubMed ID: 25225410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hydro-biogeochemical impacts of fugitive methane on a shallow unconfined aquifer.
Forde ON; Cahill AG; Mayer KU; Mayer B; Simister RL; Finke N; Crowe SA; Cherry JA; Parker BL
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():1342-1354. PubMed ID: 31470496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.
Claire Botner E; Townsend-Small A; Nash DB; Xu X; Schimmelmann A; Miller JH
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 May; 190(6):322. PubMed ID: 29721622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A stream-based methane monitoring approach for evaluating groundwater impacts associated with unconventional gas development.
Heilweil VM; Stolp BJ; Kimball BA; Susong DD; Marston TM; Gardner PM
Ground Water; 2013; 51(4):511-24. PubMed ID: 23758706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can groundwater sampling techniques used in monitoring wells influence methane concentrations and isotopes?
Rivard C; Bordeleau G; Lavoie D; Lefebvre R; Malet X
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):191. PubMed ID: 29508059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distribution and origin of groundwater methane in the Wattenberg oil and gas field of northern Colorado.
Li H; Carlson KH
Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(3):1484-91. PubMed ID: 24456231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Naphthenic acids in groundwater overlying undeveloped shale gas and tight oil reservoirs.
Ahad JME; Pakdel H; Lavoie D; Lefebvre R; Peru KM; Headley JV
Chemosphere; 2018 Jan; 191():664-672. PubMed ID: 29078190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Land-use controls on sources and fate of nitrate in shallow groundwater of an agricultural area revealed by multiple environmental tracers.
Koh DC; Mayer B; Lee KS; Ko KS
J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Oct; 118(1-2):62-78. PubMed ID: 20828864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microbial and Biogeochemical Indicators of Methane in Groundwater Aquifers of the Denver Basin, Colorado.
Stanish LF; Sherwood OA; Lackey G; Osborn S; Robertson CE; Harris JK; Pace N; Ryan JN
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 55(1):292-303. PubMed ID: 33296185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detecting anomalous methane in groundwater within hydrocarbon production areas across the United States.
Wen T; Liu M; Woda J; Zheng G; Brantley SL
Water Res; 2021 Jul; 200():117236. PubMed ID: 34062403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Groundwater protection and unconventional gas extraction: the critical need for field-based hydrogeological research.
Jackson RE; Gorody AW; Mayer B; Roy JW; Ryan MC; Van Stempvoort DR
Ground Water; 2013; 51(4):488-510. PubMed ID: 23745972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of methane sources in groundwater in northeastern Pennsylvania.
Molofsky LJ; Connor JA; Wylie AS; Wagner T; Farhat SK
Ground Water; 2013; 51(3):333-49. PubMed ID: 23560830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Exploring How to Use Groundwater Chemistry to Identify Migration of Methane near Shale Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin.
Wen T; Woda J; Marcon V; Niu X; Li Z; Brantley SL
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Aug; 53(15):9317-9327. PubMed ID: 31299147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Methane in groundwater before, during, and after hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale.
Barth-Naftilan E; Sohng J; Saiers JE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jul; 115(27):6970-6975. PubMed ID: 29915033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Monitoring the evolution and migration of a methane gas plume in an unconfined sandy aquifer using time-lapse GPR and ERT.
Steelman CM; Klazinga DR; Cahill AG; Endres AL; Parker BL
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Oct; 205():12-24. PubMed ID: 28865808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.
Osborn SG; Vengosh A; Warner NR; Jackson RB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(20):8172-6. PubMed ID: 21555547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Methane Occurrences in Aquifers Overlying the Barnett Shale Play with a Focus on Parker County, Texas.
Nicot JP; Mickler P; Larson T; Clara Castro M; Darvari R; Uhlman K; Costley R
Ground Water; 2017 Jul; 55(4):469-481. PubMed ID: 28248422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
