These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal neoplasia is easily learned, efficacious, and safe. Wang AY; Flynn MM; Patrie JT; Cox DG; Bleibel W; Mann JA; Sauer BG; Shami VM Surg Endosc; 2014 Apr; 28(4):1348-54. PubMed ID: 24232051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Depth of the cutting plane with underwater and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized study. Matsueda K; Takeuchi Y; Kitamura M; Yamashina T; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T; Uedo N J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Apr; 37(4):741-748. PubMed ID: 34978107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. de Souza MHG; do Espirito Santo PA; Maluf-Filho F; Lenz L Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):208. PubMed ID: 37552342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps). Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Underwater EMR of adenomas of the appendiceal orifice (with video). Binmoeller KF; Hamerski CM; Shah JN; Bhat YM; Kane SD Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):638-42. PubMed ID: 26375437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propensity score-matched analysis of endoscopic resection for recurrent colorectal neoplasms: A pilot study. Ohmori M; Yamasaki Y; Iwagami H; Nakahira H; Matsuura N; Shichijo S; Maekawa A; Kanesaka T; Yamamoto S; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Okada H; Takeuchi Y J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2568-2574. PubMed ID: 33843099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Lenz L; Martins B; Andrade de Paulo G; Kawaguti FS; Baba ER; Uemura RS; Gusmon CC; Geiger SN; Moura RN; Pennacchi C; Simas de Lima M; Safatle-Ribeiro AV; Hashimoto CL; Ribeiro U; Maluf-Filho F Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):549-558. PubMed ID: 36309072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Backes Y; Moons LM; van Bergeijk JD; Berk L; Ter Borg F; Ter Borg PC; Elias SG; Geesing JM; Groen JN; Hadithi M; Hardwick JC; Kerkhof M; Mangen MJ; Straathof JW; Schröder R; Schwartz MP; Spanier BW; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Wolfhagen FH; Koch AD BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 27229709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Underwater Ni DQ; Lu YP; Liu XQ; Gao LY; Huang X World J Clin Cases; 2020 Oct; 8(20):4826-4837. PubMed ID: 33195650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]