These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31446093)
1. Investigation of quality review issues and the association with application characteristics for new drug applications in first-cycle reviews. Liou JS; Chang LC Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Nov; 108():104448. PubMed ID: 31446093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulatory review intervals for ophthalmic new drug applications at the US Food and Drug Administration. Novack GD Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 126(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 9683158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation. Rising K; Bacchetti P; Bero L PLoS Med; 2008 Nov; 5(11):e217; discussion e217. PubMed ID: 19067477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examination of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies and drug safety in the US. Rodriguez-Monguio R; Spielberger K; Seoane-Vazquez E Res Social Adm Pharm; 2014; 10(1):232-8. PubMed ID: 23611865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Key Evidence Supporting Prescription Opioids Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1997 to 2018. Heyward J; Moore TJ; Chen J; Meek K; Lurie P; Alexander GC Ann Intern Med; 2020 Dec; 173(12):956-963. PubMed ID: 32986486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applications for FDA approval to market a dew drug: patent submission and listing requirements and application of 30-month stays on approval of abbreviated new drug applications certifying that a patent claiming a drug is invalid or will not be infringed. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS Fed Regist; 2003 Jun; 68(117):36675-712. PubMed ID: 12814136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of regulatory review times of new drugs in Japan: association with characteristics of new drug applications, regulatory agency, and pharmaceutical companies. Ishibashi T; Kusama M; Sugiyama Y; Ono S J Clin Pharm Ther; 2012 Dec; 37(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 22734557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overview of recently approved 505(b)(2) new drug applications (2010-2012): role of clinical pharmacology. Agarwal S; Qiu W; Sahajwalla C J Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Dec; 54(12):1330-6. PubMed ID: 24958449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Participation of women and sex analyses in late-phase clinical trials of new molecular entity drugs and biologics approved by the FDA in 2007-2009. Poon R; Khanijow K; Umarjee S; Fadiran E; Yu M; Zhang L; Parekh A J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Jul; 22(7):604-16. PubMed ID: 23768021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific and regulatory reasons for delay and denial of FDA approval of initial applications for new drugs, 2000-2012. Sacks LV; Shamsuddin HH; Yasinskaya YI; Bouri K; Lanthier ML; Sherman RE JAMA; 2014 Jan 22-29; 311(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 24449316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FDA advisory committees and the new drug approval process. Kaitin KI; Melville A; Morris B J Clin Pharmacol; 1989 Oct; 29(10):886-90. PubMed ID: 2592579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of factors associated with first-cycle drug approval rates and regulatory outcomes for new drug applications. Chang LC; Vanheusen M; Fang X; Breder CD Pharmacol Res; 2019 Jan; 139():166-172. PubMed ID: 30408574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Demographics of clinical trials participants in pivotal clinical trials for new molecular entity drugs and biologics approved by FDA From 2010 to 2012. Eshera N; Itana H; Zhang L; Soon G; Fadiran EO Am J Ther; 2015; 22(6):435-55. PubMed ID: 25621972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of Drugs Approved via the 505(b)(2) Pathway: Uncovering Drug Development Trends and Regulatory Requirements. Freije I; Lamouche S; Tanguay M Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2020 Jan; 54(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 32008242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Priority review drugs approved by the FDA and the EMA: time for international regulatory harmonization of pharmaceuticals? Alqahtani S; Seoane-Vazquez E; Rodriguez-Monguio R; Eguale T Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Jul; 24(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 26013294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient-Reported Outcomes Labeling for Products Approved by the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products of the US Food and Drug Administration (2010-2014). Gnanasakthy A; DeMuro C; Clark M; Haydysch E; Ma E; Bonthapally V J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(16):1928-34. PubMed ID: 27069082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of pharmacometrics on drug approval and labeling decisions: a survey of 42 new drug applications. Bhattaram VA; Booth BP; Ramchandani RP; Beasley BN; Wang Y; Tandon V; Duan JZ; Baweja RK; Marroum PJ; Uppoor RS; Rahman NA; Sahajwalla CG; Powell JR; Mehta MU; Gobburu JV AAPS J; 2005 Oct; 7(3):E503-12. PubMed ID: 16353928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New drug approval times and clinical evidence in Japan. Ono S; Yoshioka C; Asaka O; Tamura K; Shibata T; Saito K Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Dec; 26(6):660-72. PubMed ID: 16122988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Labeling of FDA-Approved New Drugs (2016-2020): Counts, Categories, and Comprehensibility. Gnanasakthy A; Norcross L; DeMuro Romano C; Carson RT Value Health; 2022 Apr; 25(4):647-655. PubMed ID: 35365309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Labeling in the United States (2011-2015). Gnanasakthy A; Mordin M; Evans E; Doward L; DeMuro C Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):420-429. PubMed ID: 28292487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]