These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31446644)

  • 21. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ultrasonography for noninvasive and real-time evaluation of peri-implant tissue dimensions.
    Chan HL; Sinjab K; Li J; Chen Z; Wang HL; Kripfgans OD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Aug; 45(8):986-995. PubMed ID: 29757464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors affecting the possibility to detect buccal bone condition around dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 27444713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Higher Resolution in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Is Accompanied by Improved Bone Detection in Peri-implant Bone Despite Metal Artifact Presence.
    Kerkfeld V; Meyer U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1331-1338. PubMed ID: 30427964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Buccal bone thickness at dental implants in the aesthetic zone: A 1-year follow-up cone beam computed tomography study.
    Slagter KW; Raghoebar GM; Bakker NA; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 45(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 27939041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of the blooming artefact on dental implant dimensions in 13 cone-beam computed tomography devices.
    Wanderley VA; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Leite AF; Pauwels R; Shujaat S; Jacobs R; Oliveira ML
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jul; 7(1):67. PubMed ID: 34258634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flapless, CBCT-guided osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant installation. I: radiographic examination and surgical technique. A prospective 1-year follow-up.
    Fornell J; Johansson LÅ; Bolin A; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 21443611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of detecting and measuring buccal bone thickness adjacent to titanium dental implants-a cone beam computed tomography in vitro study.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):432-438. PubMed ID: 30126809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery: I. Clinical and radiographic parameters.
    Fu JH; Oh TJ; Benavides E; Rudek I; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):458-67. PubMed ID: 23594026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest.
    Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Nair M; Nonhoff J; Lundgren T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 25216143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-Dimensional buccal bone anatomy and aesthetic outcome of single dental implants replacing maxillary incisors.
    Veltri M; Ekestubbe A; Abrahamsson I; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):956-63. PubMed ID: 26178908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Kılıç C; Yüksel S; Avsever H; Farman A; Scarfe WC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130332. PubMed ID: 24645965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT.
    Raes F; Renckens L; Aps J; Cosyn J; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):661-72. PubMed ID: 22008055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Horizontal and Vertical Dimensional Changes in Buccal Peri-Implant Alveolar Bone and Soft Tissue: A 1-Year Prospective Clinical Study.
    Kaminaka A; Nakano T; Ono S; Kato T; Yatani H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e576-85. PubMed ID: 25535809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The accuracy of probing, ultrasound and cone-beam CT scans for determining the buccal bone plate dimensions around oral implants - A systematic review.
    Dhondt R; Quirynen M; Tarce M; Teughels W; Temmerman A; Jacobs R
    J Periodontal Res; 2022 Aug; 57(4):754-767. PubMed ID: 35612409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of Buccal Bone Concavity in the Esthetic Zone: A Cadaver Study.
    Chung MP; Wang IC; Chan HL; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2017 Oct; 26(5):751-755. PubMed ID: 28914631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.