These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31446660)

  • 21. Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Brazilian Children with Mathematics Difficulties.
    Starling-Alves I; Júlio-Costa A; de Moura RJ; Haase VG
    Dement Neuropsychol; 2021; 15(4):524-532. PubMed ID: 35509800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differences between literates and illiterates on symbolic but not nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing.
    Zebian S; Ansari D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 22033982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Examining pitch and numerical magnitude processing in congenital amusia: A quasi-experimental pilot study.
    Nunes-Silva M; Moura R; Lopes-Silva JB; Haase VG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Aug; 38(6):630-47. PubMed ID: 27023492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Number Lines: Consistent Effects of Notation Across Output Measures.
    Kopiske KK; Franz VH
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2018; 14(3):87-100. PubMed ID: 32256903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Numerical Development.
    Siegler RS; Braithwaite DW
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2017 Jan; 68():187-213. PubMed ID: 27687122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of visual-spatial skills on the association between processing of nonsymbolic numerical magnitude and number word sequence skills.
    Lonnemann J; Müller C; Büttner G; Hasselhorn M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Feb; 178():184-197. PubMed ID: 30388483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multi-representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude in Chinese number processing.
    Liu C; Tang H; Luo YJ; Mai X
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e19373. PubMed ID: 21541303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
    Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The developmental onset of symbolic approximation: beyond nonsymbolic representations, the language of numbers matters.
    Xenidou-Dervou I; Gilmore C; van der Schoot M; van Lieshout EC
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():487. PubMed ID: 25972822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mathematical difficulties in developmental coordination disorder: Symbolic and nonsymbolic number processing.
    Gomez A; Piazza M; Jobert A; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Dehaene S; Huron C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2015; 43-44():167-78. PubMed ID: 26188690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Individual Differences in Nonsymbolic Ratio Processing Predict Symbolic Math Performance.
    Matthews PG; Lewis MR; Hubbard EM
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 26710824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Frequency-based Dissociation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Numerical Processing during Numerical Comparison.
    Rubinsten O; Korem N; Levin N; Furman T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):762-782. PubMed ID: 32083518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.
    Nemeh F; Humberstone J; Yates MJ; Reeve RA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203019. PubMed ID: 30161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The developmental relationship between nonsymbolic and symbolic fraction abilities.
    Lv J; Mao H; Zeng L; Wang X; Zhou X; Mou Y
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Aug; 232():105666. PubMed ID: 37043876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Developmental specialization in the right intraparietal sulcus for the abstract representation of numerical magnitude.
    Holloway ID; Ansari D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2627-37. PubMed ID: 19929327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Challenging the reliability and validity of cognitive measures: the case of the numerical distance effect.
    Maloney EA; Risko EF; Preston F; Ansari D; Fugelsang J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 20185118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Flanking magnitudes: dissociation between numerosity and numerical value in a selective attention task.
    Naparstek S; Safadi Z; Lichtenstein-Vidne L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1262-8. PubMed ID: 25329083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The processing of symbolic and nonsymbolic ratios in school-age children.
    Meert G; Grégoire J; Seron X; Noël MP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e82002. PubMed ID: 24312393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.