These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31446660)

  • 41. The Mediating Relation between Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Foundations of Math Competence.
    Price GR; Fuchs LS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148981. PubMed ID: 26859564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds.
    Hoffmann D; Hornung C; Martin R; Schiltz C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):775-91. PubMed ID: 24055929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Task Constraints Affect Mapping From Approximate Number System Estimates to Symbolic Numbers.
    Chesney DL; Matthews PG
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1801. PubMed ID: 30386272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Spatial associations in relational reasoning: evidence for a SNARC-like effect.
    Prado J; Van der Henst JB; Noveck IA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1143-50. PubMed ID: 18938779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The role of numerical and non-numerical cues in nonsymbolic number processing: Evidence from the line bisection task.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1844-59. PubMed ID: 25495403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: A review of theory, evidence, and outstanding questions.
    Leibovich T; Ansari D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 70(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 26913782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Processing directional information in stimuli inhibits the spatial association of luminance levels.
    Wang Q; Wu Y; Zhang F; Tao W; Wang C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Nov; 84(8):2596-2606. PubMed ID: 36207662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Symbols Are Special: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Symbolic, Nonsymbolic, and Non-Numerical Magnitude Processing in the Human Brain.
    Sokolowski HM; Hawes Z; Peters L; Ansari D
    Cereb Cortex Commun; 2021; 2(3):tgab048. PubMed ID: 34447935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Disentangling the Mechanisms of Symbolic Number Processing in Adults' Mathematics and Arithmetic Achievement.
    Orrantia J; Muñez D; Matilla L; Sanchez R; San Romualdo S; Verschaffel L
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 43(1):. PubMed ID: 30648799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number.
    Mundy E; Gilmore CK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Aug; 103(4):490-502. PubMed ID: 19327782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Varieties of quantity estimation in children.
    Sella F; Berteletti I; Lucangeli D; Zorzi M
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Jun; 51(6):758-70. PubMed ID: 26010388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Middle-schoolers' misconceptions in discretized nonsymbolic proportional reasoning explain fraction biases better than their continuous reasoning: Evidence from correlation and cluster analyses.
    Abreu-Mendoza RA; Powell AB; Renninger KA; Rivera LM; Vulic J; Weimar S; Rosenberg-Lee M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Jun; 143():101575. PubMed ID: 37229979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Shared and distinct neural circuitry for nonsymbolic and symbolic double-digit addition.
    Bugden S; Woldorff MG; Brannon EM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Mar; 40(4):1328-1343. PubMed ID: 30548735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Toward a unified account of nonsymbolic and symbolic representations of number: Insights from a combined psychophysical-computational approach.
    Rinaldi L; Parente L; Marelli M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):985-994. PubMed ID: 34918278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Continuous visual properties of number influence the formation of novel symbolic representations.
    Merkley R; Scerif G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1860-70. PubMed ID: 25622722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence.
    Lourenco SF; Bonny JW; Fernandez EP; Rao S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Nov; 109(46):18737-42. PubMed ID: 23091023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Deconstructing spatial-numerical associations.
    Shaki S; Fischer MH
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():109-113. PubMed ID: 29500963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition.
    Shaki S; Fischer MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):804-9. PubMed ID: 22428673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The SNARC effect is not a unitary phenomenon.
    Basso Moro S; Dell'Acqua R; Cutini S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):688-695. PubMed ID: 29264847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Training nonsymbolic proportional reasoning in children and its effects on their symbolic math abilities.
    Gouet C; Carvajal S; Halberda J; Peña M
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104154. PubMed ID: 31945678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.