These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31447025)

  • 1. Total methane emission rates and losses from 23 biogas plants.
    Scheutz C; Fredenslund AM
    Waste Manag; 2019 Sep; 97():38-46. PubMed ID: 31447025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Danish national effort to minimise methane emissions from biogas plants.
    Michael Fredenslund A; Gudmundsson E; Maria Falk J; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2023 Feb; 157():321-329. PubMed ID: 36592586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of methane emissions from UK biogas plants.
    Bakkaloglu S; Lowry D; Fisher RE; France JL; Brunner D; Chen H; Nisbet EG
    Waste Manag; 2021 Apr; 124():82-93. PubMed ID: 33610114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fugitive methane emissions from two agricultural biogas plants.
    Baldé H; Wagner-Riddle C; MacDonald D; VanderZaag A
    Waste Manag; 2022 Sep; 151():123-130. PubMed ID: 35944429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methane losses from different biogas plant technologies.
    Wechselberger V; Reinelt T; Yngvesson J; Scharfy D; Scheutz C; Huber-Humer M; Hrad M
    Waste Manag; 2023 Feb; 157():110-120. PubMed ID: 36529031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from a biological waste treatment facility.
    Jensen MB; Møller J; Mønster J; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2017 Sep; 67():375-384. PubMed ID: 28571663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On-site and ground-based remote sensing measurements of methane emissions from four biogas plants: A comparison study.
    Fredenslund AM; Hinge J; Holmgren MA; Rasmussen SG; Scheutz C
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Dec; 270():88-95. PubMed ID: 30212778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field measurements of fugitive methane emissions from three Australian waste management and biogas facilities.
    Reinelt T; McCabe BK; Hill A; Harris P; Baillie C; Liebetrau J
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jan; 137():294-303. PubMed ID: 34823136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates--implications for greenhouse gas emissions.
    Pucker J; Jungmeier G; Siegl S; Pötsch EM
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():283-91. PubMed ID: 23739470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methane loss from commercially operating biogas upgrading plants.
    Kvist T; Aryal N
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():295-300. PubMed ID: 31109529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Green-house gas mitigation capacity of a small scale rural biogas plant calculations for Bangladesh through a general life cycle assessment.
    Rahman KM; Melville L; Fulford D; Huq SI
    Waste Manag Res; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1023-1033. PubMed ID: 28784057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of methane emission rates on a biogas plant using data from laser absorption spectrometry.
    Groth A; Maurer C; Reiser M; Kranert M
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Feb; 178():359-361. PubMed ID: 25446786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
    Tilche A; Galatola M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining methane emissions from biogas plants--Operational and meteorological aspects.
    Hrad M; Piringer M; Huber-Humer M
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():234-43. PubMed ID: 26000833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of slurry removal frequency on CH
    Feng L; Bonne Guldberg L; Jørgen Hansen M; Ma C; Vinther Ohrt R; Bjarne Møller H
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jul; 149():199-206. PubMed ID: 35752107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Greenhouse gas emission reductions from domestic anaerobic digesters linked with sustainable sanitation in rural China.
    Dhingra R; Christensen ER; Liu Y; Zhong B; Wu CF; Yost MG; Remais JV
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2345-52. PubMed ID: 21348471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental assessment of energy generation from agricultural and farm waste through anaerobic digestion.
    Nayal FS; Mammadov A; Ciliz N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 2):389-399. PubMed ID: 27742149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methane emissions from digestate at an agricultural biogas plant.
    Baldé H; VanderZaag AC; Burtt SD; Wagner-Riddle C; Crolla A; Desjardins RL; MacDonald DJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 216():914-22. PubMed ID: 27323243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions following anaerobic digestion of sludge in Japanese sewage treatment facilities.
    Oshita K; Okumura T; Takaoka M; Fujimori T; Appels L; Dewil R
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Nov; 171():175-81. PubMed ID: 25194911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from 10 biogas plants within the agricultural sector.
    Liebetrau J; Reinelt T; Clemens J; Hafermann C; Friehe J; Weiland P
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):1370-9. PubMed ID: 23508164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.