These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1025 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31447314)

  • 1. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-Risk Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Anantha-Narayanan M; Kandasamy VV; Reddy YN; Megaly M; Baskaran J; Pershad A; Suri RM; Garcia S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):441-452. PubMed ID: 31678116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low to moderate surgical risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis.
    Elmaraezy A; Ismail A; Abushouk AI; Eltoomy M; Saad S; Negida A; Abdelaty OM; Abdallah AR; Aboelfotoh AM; Hassan HM; Elmaraezy AG; Morsi M; Althaher F; Althaher M; AlSafadi AM
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Aug; 17(1):234. PubMed ID: 28836953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.
    Kolte D; Vlahakes GJ; Palacios IF; Sakhuja R; Passeri JJ; Inglessis I; Elmariah S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 74(12):1532-1540. PubMed ID: 31537261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
    Sardar P; Kundu A; Chatterjee S; Feldman DN; Owan T; Kakouros N; Nairooz R; Pape LA; Feldman T; Dawn Abbott J; Elmariah S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):504-515. PubMed ID: 28398671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis of transfemoral TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Arora S; Vaidya SR; Strassle PD; Misenheimer JA; Rhodes JA; Ramm CJ; Wheeler EN; Caranasos TG; Cavender MA; Vavalle JP
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):806-812. PubMed ID: 29068166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcatheter vs surgical aortic-valve replacement in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk candidates: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Khan SU; Lone AN; Saleem MA; Kaluski E
    Clin Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 40(11):974-981. PubMed ID: 29168984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An updated meta-analysis of TAVR in patients at intermediate risk for SAVR.
    Lazkani M; Singh N; Howe C; Patel N; Colón MJ; Tasset M; Amabile O; Morris M; Fang HK; Pershad A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Jan; 20(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 29748086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison on the prognosis of severe aortic stenosis patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Fan P; Ye YZ; Ma X
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 50(9):913-919. PubMed ID: 36096710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials and Propensity-Matched Studies.
    Rawasia WF; Usman MS; Mujeeb FA; Zafar M; Khan SU; Alkhouli M
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 31672536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Abbas AE; Ternacle J; Pibarot P; Xu K; Alu M; Rogers E; Hahn RT; Leon M; Thourani VH
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Aug; 14(8):e012364. PubMed ID: 34387097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in low to intermediate surgical risk aortic stenosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang D; Mao X; Liu D; Zhang J; Luo G; Luo L
    Clin Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1414-1422. PubMed ID: 32926456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
    Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Garg A; Rao SV; Visveswaran G; Agrawal S; Sharma A; Garg L; Mahata I; Garg J; Singal D; Cohen M; Kostis JB
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 29(6):209-216. PubMed ID: 28570236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Conte JV; Hermiller J; Resar JR; Deeb GM; Gleason TG; Adams DH; Popma JJ; Yakubov SJ; Watson D; Guo J; Zorn GL; Reardon MJ
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 29195573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.