309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31448404)
21. Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy.
Russell T; Khan S; Elman J; Katznelson R; Cooper RM
Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 22352799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.
Serocki G; Neumann T; Scharf E; Dörges V; Cavus E
Minerva Anestesiol; 2013 Feb; 79(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 23032922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during tracheal intubation and dental injury risks of intubation by beginners: a manikin study.
Fukuda T; Sugimoto Y; Yamashita S; Toyooka H; Tanaka M
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2011 Mar; 49(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 21453897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Applied forces with direct versus indirect laryngoscopy in neonatal intubation: a randomized crossover mannequin study.
Cavallin F; Sala C; Maglio S; Bua B; Villani PE; Menciassi A; Tognarelli S; Trevisanuto D
Can J Anaesth; 2023 May; 70(5):861-868. PubMed ID: 36788198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of different intubation techniques performed inside a moving ambulance: a manikin study.
Wong KB; Lui CT; Chan WY; Lau TL; Tang SY; Tsui KL
Hong Kong Med J; 2014 Aug; 20(4):304-12. PubMed ID: 24914074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of the AMBU ISCOPE and Macintosh laryngoscopes: first experience with a new device for tracheal intubation: a manikin study.
Vedel AG; Rasmussen LS
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 23426132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does experience influence the forces exerted on maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy? A manikin study using the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Bucx MJ; van Geel RT; Wegener JT; Robers C; Stijnen T
Can J Anaesth; 1995 Feb; 42(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 7720158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Macintosh and Glidescope® performance by Advanced Cardiac Life Support providers: a manikin study.
Stroumpoulis K; Xanthos T; Bassiakou E; Iacovidou N; Koudouna E; Michaloliakou C; Papadimitriou L
Minerva Anestesiol; 2011 Jan; 77(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 20935604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy--a manikin study.
Maharaj CH; Higgins BD; Harte BH; Laffey JG
Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 16674623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomised clinical trial comparing the 'sniffing' and neutral position using channelled (KingVision
Mendonca C; Ungureanu N; Nowicka A; Kumar P
Anaesthesia; 2018 Jul; 73(7):847-855. PubMed ID: 29660807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial.
Smereka J; Ladny JR; Naylor A; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146. PubMed ID: 28341185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Forces generated by Macintosh and GlideScope® laryngoscopes in four airway-training manikins.
Lee C; Russell T; Firat M; Cooper RM
Anaesthesia; 2013 May; 68(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 23573844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of seven videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope in manikins by experienced and novice personnel.
Pieters BM; Wilbers NE; Huijzer M; Winkens B; van Zundert AA
Anaesthesia; 2016 May; 71(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 26973253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison between the GlideScope® classic and GlideScope® direct video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation.
Heuer JF; Heitmann S; Crozier TA; Bleckmann A; Quintel M; Russo SG
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():330-6. PubMed ID: 27555188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the McGrath
Giraudon A; Bordes-Demolis M; Blondeau B; Sibai de Panthou N; Ferrand N; Bello M; Dahlet V; Semjen F; Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2017 Oct; 36(5):261-265. PubMed ID: 28323237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A mannequin study of intubation with the AP advance and GlideScope Ranger videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Hodd JA; Doyle DJ; Gupta S; Dalton JE; Cata JP; Brewer EJ; James M; Sessler DI
Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 21890882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study.
Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T
J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
