328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31448473)
1. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Single-Center Prospective Comparative Study of Two Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: LithoVue (Boston Scientific, USA) and Uscope PU3022a (Zhuhai Pusen, China).
Patil A; Agrawal S; Singh A; Ganpule A; Sabnis R; Desai M
J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):274-278. PubMed ID: 32967450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study.
Ali AI; Eldakhakhny A; Abdelfadel A; Rohiem MF; Elbadry M; Hassan A
World J Urol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 35895116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN™) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study.
Agrawal S; Patil A; Sabnis RB; Singh AG; Ganpule AP; Desai MR
World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3957-3962. PubMed ID: 33970313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Avoiding a Lemon: Performance Consistency of Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Winship B; Wollin D; Carlos E; Li J; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 30612445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial experience of comparison between two slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscopes: Indoscope Sleek (Bioradmedisys™) Versus Uscope PU3033A (Pusen™): A single-center prospective study.
Agrawal S; Survase P; Singh AG; Ganpule AP; Sabnis RB; Desai MR
World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2817-2821. PubMed ID: 37543971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-Use Versus Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes for the Treatment of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Qi S; Yang E; Bao J; Yang N; Guo H; Wang G; Li N; Cui X; Gao W; Ou T; Wang J; Wang Z; Niu Y
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 31432716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Flexible Digital Ureteroscopes: ACMI/Olympus Invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V.
Shah K; Monga M; Knudsen B
Urology; 2015 Jun; 85(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 25711157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.
Marchini GS; Torricelli FC; Batagello CA; Monga M; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):658-670. PubMed ID: 31397987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscope Performance between Reusable and Single-Use Models.
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Geavlete P; Popescu R; Geavlete B
J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a new disposable flexible ureterorenoscope and comparison to an established disposable flexible ureterorenoscope: a prospective, observational study.
Patterson K; Yap LC; Elamin M; Maccraith E; Muheilan M; Sharif A; McGuinness G; Darcy F; Brady C; Hennessey D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2021 May; 53(5):875-881. PubMed ID: 33386582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Device profile of the LithoVue single-use digital flexible ureteroscope in the removal of kidney stones: overview of safety and efficacy.
Forbes CM; Lundeen C; Beebe S; Moore JP; Knudsen BE; Humphreys MR; Chew B
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Dec; 17(12):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 33307869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.
Schlager D; Obaid MA; Hein S; Wilhelm K; Schönthaler M; Gratzke C; Miernik A; Schoeb DS
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 32475165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
