These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31448968)

  • 1. Using Response Times for Joint Modeling of Response and Omission Behavior.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(3):425-453. PubMed ID: 31448968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Model-Based Approach to the Disentanglement and Differential Treatment of Engaged and Disengaged Item Omissions.
    Ulitzsch E; Zhang S; Pohl S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(3):599-619. PubMed ID: 38594939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hidden Markov Item Response Theory Models for Responses and Response Times.
    Molenaar D; Oberski D; Vermunt J; De Boeck P
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):606-626. PubMed ID: 27712114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parametric and semiparametric model-based estimates of the finite population mean for two-stage cluster samples with item nonresponse.
    Yuan Y; Little RJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1172-80. PubMed ID: 17489967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Joint Modeling of Ability and Differential Speed Using Responses and Response Times.
    Fox JP; Marianti S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(4):540-53. PubMed ID: 27269482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
    Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Two-Dimensional Multiple-Choice Model Accounting for Omissions.
    Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2540. PubMed ID: 30618961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Taking the Missing Propensity Into Account When Estimating Competence Scores: Evaluation of Item Response Theory Models for Nonignorable Omissions.
    Köhler C; Pohl S; Carstensen CH
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):850-874. PubMed ID: 29795844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data.
    Jin IH; Jeon M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):236-260. PubMed ID: 29987708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When Nonresponse Mechanisms Change: Effects on Trends and Group Comparisons in International Large-Scale Assessments.
    Sachse KA; Mahler N; Pohl S
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):699-726. PubMed ID: 32655180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling item revisiting behavior in computer-based testing: Exploring the effect of item revisitations as collateral information.
    Zhang J; Wang C; Lu J
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Aug; 56(5):4661-4681. PubMed ID: 37608234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing.
    Wang C; Xu G; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):223-254. PubMed ID: 27796763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times.
    Molenaar D; de Boeck P
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):279-297. PubMed ID: 29392567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.