431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31449806)
1. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.
Sutkin G; Zyczynski HM; Sridhar A; Jelovsek JE; Rardin CR; Mazloomdoost D; Rahn DD; Nguyen JN; Andy UU; Meyer I; Gantz MG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):161.e1-161.e8. PubMed ID: 31449806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
Barber MD; Brubaker L; Burgio KL; Richter HE; Nygaard I; Weidner AC; Menefee SA; Lukacz ES; Norton P; Schaffer J; Nguyen JN; Borello-France D; Goode PS; Jakus-Waldman S; Spino C; Warren LK; Gantz MG; Meikle SF;
JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1023-34. PubMed ID: 24618964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics Associated With Surgical Failure After Native Tissue Apical Prolapse Repair.
Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Hynan LS; Pruszynski JE
Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 143(2):312-319. PubMed ID: 38061041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen as Adjunct to Native Tissue Vaginal Apical Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE; Hynan LS
JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(7):615-625. PubMed ID: 37581673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
Meyer I; Whitworth RE; Lukacz ES; Smith AL; Sung VW; Visco AG; Ackenbom MF; Wai CY; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG; Richter HE;
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2155-2164. PubMed ID: 32146521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative POPQ versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair at the Time of Transvaginal Apical Suspension (PREPARE trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Jeon MJ; Kim CH; Cho HH; Suh DH; Kim SR
BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e034170. PubMed ID: 31911524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair.
Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38710269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pain and activity after vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
Barber MD; Brubaker L; Nygaard I; Wai CY; Dyer KY; Ellington D; Sridhar A; Gantz MG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):233.e1-233.e16. PubMed ID: 31201809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women.
Rappa C; Saccone G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):601.e1-601.e4. PubMed ID: 27342042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.
Nager CW; Grimes CL; Nolen TL; Wai CY; Brubaker L; Jeppson PC; Wilson TS; Visco AG; Barber MD; Sutkin G; Norton P; Rardin CR; Arya L; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29232267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
