242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31449840)
1. Reasons for direct restoration failure from childhood to adolescence: A birth cohort study.
Cumerlato CBDF; Demarco FF; Barros AJD; Peres MA; Peres KG; Morales Cascaes A; de Camargo MBJ; da Silva Dos Santos I; Matijasevich A; Corrêa MB
J Dent; 2019 Oct; 89():103183. PubMed ID: 31449840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach.
Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AJ; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):960-7. PubMed ID: 23454330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.
Worthington HV; Khangura S; Seal K; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z; Rasines Alcaraz MG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Aug; 8(8):CD005620. PubMed ID: 34387873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: A systematic review.
Afrashtehfar KI; Emami E; Ahmadi M; Eilayyan O; Abi-Nader S; Tamimi F
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):345-353.e8. PubMed ID: 27765400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.
Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D
Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Success rates of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in permanent teeth in high caries-risk Filipino children.
Schüler IM; Monse B; Holmgren CJ; Lehmann T; Itchon GS; Heinrich-Weltzien R
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1493-500. PubMed ID: 25483123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
