166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31450267)
1. Modelling an adult human head on a donut-shaped gel head support for pressure ulcer prevention.
Katzengold R; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2019 Dec; 16(6):1398-1407. PubMed ID: 31450267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What makes a good head positioner for preventing occipital pressure ulcers.
Katzengold R; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2018 Apr; 15(2):243-249. PubMed ID: 29178393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating pressure redistribution surfaces for the occiput.
Werthman E; Lynch T; Ware L; Caffrey J
J Wound Care; 2019 Sep; 28(Sup9):S38-S41. PubMed ID: 31509487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Device-related pressure ulcers from a biomechanical perspective.
Levy A; Kopplin K; Gefen A
J Tissue Viability; 2017 Feb; 26(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 26927980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The biomechanical protective effects of a treatment dressing on the soft tissues surrounding a non-offloaded sacral pressure ulcer.
Schwartz D; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):684-695. PubMed ID: 30697945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep tissue loads in the seated buttocks on an off-loading wheelchair cushion versus air-cell-based and foam cushions: finite element studies.
Peko Cohen L; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2017 Dec; 14(6):1327-1334. PubMed ID: 29024413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a fluidised positioner to reduce occipital pressure injuries in intensive care patients: A pilot study.
Barakat-Johnson M; Lai M; Gefen A; Coyer F
Int Wound J; 2019 Apr; 16(2):424-432. PubMed ID: 30560571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer Modeling Studies to Assess Whether a Prophylactic Dressing Reduces the Risk for Deep Tissue Injury in the Heels of Supine Patients with Diabetes.
Levy A; Gefen A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Apr; 62(4):42-52. PubMed ID: 27065218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Peko L; Barakat-Johnson M; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2020 Dec; 17(6):1595-1606. PubMed ID: 32618418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The aetiology of medical device-related pressure ulcers and how to prevent them.
Gefen A
Br J Nurs; 2021 Aug; 30(15):S24-S30. PubMed ID: 34379465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the Biomechanical Effects of Prophylactic Sacral Dressings on Tissue Loads: A Computational Modeling Analysis.
Levy A; Gefen A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Oct; 63(10):48-55. PubMed ID: 29091038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of facial tissue stresses under medical devices post application of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant: An integrated experimental-computational study.
Margi R; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2022 Mar; 19(3):615-632. PubMed ID: 34402167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positioning immobile critically ill patients who are at risk of pressure injuries using a purpose-designed positioning device and usual care equipment: An observational feasibility study.
Sousa I; Kapp S; Santamaria N
Int Wound J; 2020 Aug; 17(4):1028-1038. PubMed ID: 32304347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The contribution of a directional preference of stiffness to the efficacy of prophylactic sacral dressings in protecting healthy and diabetic tissues from pressure injury: computational modelling studies.
Levy A; Schwartz D; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2017 Dec; 14(6):1370-1377. PubMed ID: 28960851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How patient migration in bed affects the sacral soft tissue loading and thereby the risk for a hospital-acquired pressure injury.
Lustig M; Wiggermann N; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2020 Jun; 17(3):631-640. PubMed ID: 32048476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in prophylactic performance across wound dressing types used to protect from device-related pressure ulcers caused by a continuous positive airway pressure mask.
Orlov A; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2023 Apr; 20(4):942-960. PubMed ID: 36106557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contoured Foam Cushions Cannot Provide Long-term Protection Against Pressure-Ulcers for Individuals with a Spinal Cord Injury: Modeling Studies.
Shoham N; Levy A; Kopplin K; Gefen A
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2015 Jul; 28(7):303-16. PubMed ID: 26080017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is obesity a risk factor for deep tissue injury in patients with spinal cord injury?
Elsner JJ; Gefen A
J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3322-31. PubMed ID: 19026415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Computer Modeling Study to Evaluate the Potential Effect of Air Cell-based Cushions on the Tissues of Bariatric and Diabetic Patients.
Levy A; Kopplin K; Gefen A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Jan; 62(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26779701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?
Amrani G; Gefen A
Int Wound J; 2020 Apr; 17(2):268-276. PubMed ID: 31724822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
