227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31451972)
21. Unread Second-Opinion Radiology Reports: A Potential Waste of Health Care Resources.
Heinz SA; Kwee TC; Yakar D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Oct; 215(4):934-939. PubMed ID: 32783557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations.
Sistrom CL; Dreyer KJ; Dang PP; Weilburg JB; Boland GW; Rosenthal DI; Thrall JH
Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 19710005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost accounting of radiological examinations. Cost analysis of radiological examinations of intermediate referral hospitals and general practice.
Lääperi AL
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 407():1-54. PubMed ID: 8804226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and External Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Identifying Radiology Reports Containing Recommendations for Additional Imaging.
Abbasi N; Lacson R; Kapoor N; Licaros A; Guenette JP; Burk KS; Hammer M; Desai S; Eappen S; Saini S; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Sep; 221(3):377-385. PubMed ID: 37073901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center.
van den Berg PF; Yakar D; Glaudemans AWJM; Dierckx RAJO; Kwee TC
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5395-5402. PubMed ID: 30903338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The value of official reinterpretation of trauma computed tomography scans from referring hospitals.
Onwubiko C; Mooney DP
J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Mar; 51(3):486-9. PubMed ID: 26342629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Actionability of Recommendations for Additional Imaging in Head and Neck Radiology.
Guenette JP; Lynch E; Abbasi N; Schulz K; Kumar S; Haneuse S; Kapoor N; Lacson R; Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38220042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A randomised clinical trial of routine versus selective CT imaging in acute abdomen: Impact of patient age on treatment costs and hospital resource use.
Lehtimäki TT; Valtonen H; Miettinen P; Juvonen P; Paajanen H; Vanninen R
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 87():1-7. PubMed ID: 28065368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care.
Hatzoglou V; Omuro AM; Haque S; Khakoo Y; Ganly I; Oh JH; Shukla-Dave A; Fatovic R; Gaal J; Holodny AI
Cancer; 2016 Sep; 122(17):2708-14. PubMed ID: 27219108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Frequency of chest radiography and abdominal ultrasound in the Netherlands: 1999-2003.
Speets AM; Kalmijn S; Hoes AW; van der Graaf Y; Smeets HM; Mali WP
Eur J Epidemiol; 2005; 20(12):1031-6. PubMed ID: 16331435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Abdominal and pelvic CT scan interpretation of emergency medicine physicians compared with radiologists' report and its impact on patients' outcome.
Bagheri-Hariri S; Ayoobi-Yazdi N; Afkar M; Farahmand S; Arbab M; Shahlafar N; Basirghafoori H; Seyedhoseini-Davarani S; Sedaghat M; Akhgar A
Emerg Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 28786040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Frequency of paediatric medical imaging examinations performed at a European teaching hospital over a 7-year period.
Portelli JL; McNulty JP; Bezzina P; Rainford L
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4221-4230. PubMed ID: 27011372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recommendations in Clinical
Alesawi HM; Kwee TC; Glaudemans AWJM; Yakar D
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Sep; 15(9):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 30064891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical importance of second-opinion interpretations of abdominal imaging studies in a cancer hospital and its impact on patient management.
Virarkar M; Jensen C; Klekers A; Wagner-Bartak NA; Devine CE; Lano EA; Sun J; Tharakeswara B; Bhosale P
Clin Imaging; 2022 Jun; 86():13-19. PubMed ID: 35313164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The clinical impact of subspecialized radiologist reinterpretation of abdominal imaging studies, with analysis of the types and relative frequency of interpretation discrepancies.
Lindgren EA; Patel MD; Wu Q; Melikian J; Hara AK
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Oct; 39(5):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24748211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Variation in Follow-up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology Reports: Patient, Modality, and Radiologist Predictors.
Cochon LR; Kapoor N; Carrodeguas E; Ip IK; Lacson R; Boland G; Khorasani R
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):700-707. PubMed ID: 31063082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Recommendations for Additional Imaging on Head and Neck Imaging Examinations: Interradiologist Variation and Associated Factors.
Guenette JP; Lynch E; Abbasi N; Schulz K; Kumar S; Haneuse S; Kapoor N; Lacson R; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 May; 222(5):e2330511. PubMed ID: 38294159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Differences in Perceptions Among Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Regarding Language for Incidental Findings Reporting.
Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):140-143. PubMed ID: 27657356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Utility and costs of radiologist interpretation of perioperative imaging in patients with traumatic single-level thoracolumbar fractures.
Weber MH; Sivakumaran L; Fortin M; Teles AR; Golan JD; Santaguida C; Jarzem P; Pauyo T
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28885126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of 24/7/365 Attending Radiologist Coverage on the Turnaround Time of Trauma-Related Imaging Studies Being Finalized Within 48 Hours in an Emergency Radiology Department, Offering a Perspective from a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Jalal S; Ante Z; Ouellette H; Peters S; Munk P; Nicolaou S
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Nov; 72(4):862-870. PubMed ID: 32157902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
