These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31452379)

  • 1. Applying Standards of Effectiveness to Noncontingent Reinforcement: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Meindl JN; Ivy JW; Glodowski KR; Noordin K
    Behav Modif; 2021 Jul; 45(4):619-640. PubMed ID: 31452379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior.
    Fritz JN; Jackson LM; Stiefler NA; Wimberly BS; Richardson AR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jul; 50(3):590-599. PubMed ID: 28513826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Newman ZA; Roscoe EM; Errera NP; Davis CR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):984-1000. PubMed ID: 33667327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of adventitious reinforcement during differential reinforcement of other behavior: A systematic replication.
    Rey CN; Betz AM; Sleiman AA; Kuroda T; Podlesnik CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2440-2449. PubMed ID: 31950501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adventitious reinforcement during long-duration DRO exposure.
    Rey CN; Betz AM; Sleiman AA; Kuroda T; Podlesnik CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1674-1687. PubMed ID: 32142174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of pediatric feeding disorder: A concise review.
    Van Arsdale A; Ibañez VF; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2024 Jul; 57(3):798-802. PubMed ID: 38566442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noncontingent reinforcement competes with response performance.
    Kelley ME; Nadler CB; Rey C; Cowie S; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 May; 107(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 28453222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of a punisher assessment for decreasing automatically reinforced problem behavior.
    Verriden AL; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Feb; 52(1):205-226. PubMed ID: 30238452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of synchronous and noncontingent stimulus delivery on task engagement.
    Hardesty EM; Lerman DC; Hardee JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Jun; 56(3):664-673. PubMed ID: 37077129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Providing noncontingent, alternative, functional reinforcers during delays following functional communication training.
    Sumter ME; Gifford MR; Tiger JH; Effertz HM; Fulton CJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2319-2329. PubMed ID: 32307714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out.
    Dupuis DL; Lerman DC; Tsami L; Shireman ML
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 26118940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of environmental enrichment as treatment for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
    Gover HC; Fahmie TA; McKeown CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Feb; 52(1):299-314. PubMed ID: 30242793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on functional response classes: a translational study.
    Heinicke MR; Carr JE; LeBlanc LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(3):511-26. PubMed ID: 23060665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An integrated model for guiding the selection of treatment components for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
    Berg WK; Wacker DP; Ringdahl JE; Stricker J; Vinquist K; Salil Kumar Dutt A; Dolezal D; Luke J; Kemmerer L; Mews J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):617-38. PubMed ID: 26990962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of differential reinforcement and noncontingent reinforcement to treat food selectivity in a child with autism.
    Allison J; Wilder DA; Chong I; Lugo A; Pike J; Rudy N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(3):613-7. PubMed ID: 23060675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications.
    Phillips CL; Iannaccone JA; Rooker GW; Hagopian LP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Apr; 50(2):357-376. PubMed ID: 28177118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nominally acceptable integrity failures negatively affect interventions involving intermittent reinforcement.
    Jones SH; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2022 Oct; 55(4):1109-1123. PubMed ID: 35822271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of children's and caregivers' preferences for treatments for escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Owen TM; Luczynski KC; Rodriguez NM; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):946-965. PubMed ID: 33772782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment.
    Wallace MD; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 23322927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevention of the development of problem behavior: A laboratory model.
    Fahmie TA; Macaskill AC; Kazemi E; Elmer UC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 29205337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.