These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31452598)

  • 1. Gene Families, Epistasis and the Amino Acid Preferences of Protein Homologs.
    Ferrada E
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2019; 15():1176934319870485. PubMed ID: 31452598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Site-Specific Amino Acid Preferences Are Mostly Conserved in Two Closely Related Protein Homologs.
    Doud MB; Ashenberg O; Bloom JD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Nov; 32(11):2944-60. PubMed ID: 26226986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Site-Specific Amino Acid Preferences of Homologous Proteins Depend on Sequence Divergence.
    Ferrada E
    Genome Biol Evol; 2019 Jan; 11(1):121-135. PubMed ID: 30496400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epistasis Creates Invariant Sites and Modulates the Rate of Molecular Evolution.
    Patel R; Carnevale V; Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2022 May; 39(5):. PubMed ID: 35575390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutational studies on resurrected ancestral proteins reveal conservation of site-specific amino acid preferences throughout evolutionary history.
    Risso VA; Manssour-Triedo F; Delgado-Delgado A; Arco R; Barroso-delJesus A; Ingles-Prieto A; Godoy-Ruiz R; Gavira JA; Gaucher EA; Ibarra-Molero B; Sanchez-Ruiz JM
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Feb; 32(2):440-55. PubMed ID: 25392342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shifts in amino acid preferences as proteins evolve: A synthesis of experimental and theoretical work.
    Youssef N; Susko E; Roger AJ; Bielawski JP
    Protein Sci; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2009-2028. PubMed ID: 34322924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How mutational epistasis impairs predictability in protein evolution and design.
    Miton CM; Tokuriki N
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1260-72. PubMed ID: 26757214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contingency and entrenchment in protein evolution under purifying selection.
    Shah P; McCandlish DM; Plotkin JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(25):E3226-35. PubMed ID: 26056312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of Amino Acid Propensities under Stability-Mediated Epistasis.
    Youssef N; Susko E; Roger AJ; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Mar; 39(3):. PubMed ID: 35134997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strong epistatic interactions within a single protein.
    Parera M; Martinez MA
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jun; 31(6):1546-53. PubMed ID: 24682281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Context-Dependent Mutation Effects in Proteins.
    Poelwijk FJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1851():123-134. PubMed ID: 30298395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories.
    Weinreich DM; Watson RA; Chao L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16050094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changing preferences: deformation of single position amino acid fitness landscapes and evolution of proteins.
    Bazykin GA
    Biol Lett; 2015 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 26445980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of mutation bias and hydrophobicity on the substitution rates and sequence entropies of protein evolution.
    Jiménez-Santos MJ; Arenas M; Bastolla U
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5549. PubMed ID: 30310736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pervasive contingency and entrenchment in a billion years of Hsp90 evolution.
    Starr TN; Flynn JM; Mishra P; Bolon DNA; Thornton JW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(17):4453-4458. PubMed ID: 29626131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic survey of an intragenic epistatic landscape.
    Bank C; Hietpas RT; Jensen JD; Bolon DN
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):229-38. PubMed ID: 25371431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection biases the prevalence and type of epistasis along adaptive trajectories.
    Draghi JA; Plotkin JB
    Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3120-31. PubMed ID: 24151997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comprehensive biophysical description of pairwise epistasis throughout an entire protein domain.
    Olson CA; Wu NC; Sun R
    Curr Biol; 2014 Nov; 24(22):2643-51. PubMed ID: 25455030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular ensembles make evolution unpredictable.
    Sailer ZR; Harms MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(45):11938-11943. PubMed ID: 29078365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shifting Fitness and Epistatic Landscapes Reflect Trade-offs along an Evolutionary Pathway.
    Steinberg B; Ostermeier M
    J Mol Biol; 2016 Jul; 428(13):2730-43. PubMed ID: 27173379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.