These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31453355)

  • 1. Intracochlear Pressure Changes After Cochlea Implant Electrode Pullback-Reduction of Intracochlear Trauma.
    Lauer G; Uçta J; Decker L; Ernst A; Mittmann P
    Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 4(4):441-445. PubMed ID: 31453355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimizing Intracochlear Pressure: Influence of the Insertion Sheath.
    Ucta C; Mittmann P; Ernst A; Seidl R; Lauer G
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 33647910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intracochlear Pressure Changes due to 2 Electrode Types: An Artificial Model Experiment.
    Mittmann P; Mittmann M; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):712-716. PubMed ID: 28025904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Underwater Insertion on Intracochlear Pressure.
    Riemann C; Sudhoff H; Todt I
    Front Surg; 2020; 7():546779. PubMed ID: 33425980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Residual Hearing Preservation Outcomes When Using Two Types of Slim Electrode Arrays in Cochlear Implantation.
    Ramos-Macias A; O'Leary S; Ramos-deMiguel A; Bester C; Falcon-González JC
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5S Suppl 1):S29-S37. PubMed ID: 31225820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement and Mitigation of Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.
    Banakis Hartl RM; Greene NT
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 34753876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advances to electrode pullback in cochlear implant surgery.
    Todt I; Basta D; Seidl R; Ernst A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():126767. PubMed ID: 23193376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimisation of the round window opening in cochlear implant surgery in wet and dry conditions: impact on intracochlear pressure changes.
    Mittmann P; Ernst A; Mittmann M; Todt I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3609-3613. PubMed ID: 26993657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation.
    Giardina CK; Brown KD; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Hutson KA; Pillsbury HC; Fitzpatrick DC
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):833-848. PubMed ID: 30335669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insertional depth-dependent intracochlear pressure changes in a model of cochlear implantation.
    Mittmann M; Ernst A; Mittmann P; Todt I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 137(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 27575779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes.
    Todt I; Utca J; Karimi D; Ernst A; Mittmann P
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 May; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 28490377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intracochlear fluid pressure changes related to the insertional speed of a CI electrode.
    Todt I; Mittmann P; Ernst A
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():507241. PubMed ID: 25140316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diving technique of cochlear implant electrode insertion for hearing preservation: how I do it.
    Zhang Z; Si Y; Guo J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Oct; 281(10):5563-5566. PubMed ID: 38977480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Intracochlear Trauma Caused by Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays through Different Quadrants of the Round Window.
    Martins Gde S; Brito Neto RV; Tsuji RK; Gebrim EM; Bento RF
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():236364. PubMed ID: 26236719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evaluation of a slim perimodiolar electrode: surgical technique in relation to intracochlear position and cochlear implant outcomes.
    Heutink F; Verbist BM; Mens LHM; Huinck WJ; Mylanus EAM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 277(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 31650350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic intracochlear pressure measurement during cochlear implant electrode insertion.
    Ordonez F; Riemann C; Mueller S; Sudhoff H; Todt I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 139(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 31298591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Proximity to the Modiolus for the Cochlear CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode Array on Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Programming Levels.
    Greisiger R; Heldahl MG; Myhrum M; Sørensen TM; Dammerud JJ; Rasmussen K; Korslund H; Bunne M; Jablonski GE
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 35504247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.