185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31453718)
1. Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.
Krammer J; Zolotarev S; Hillman I; Karalis K; Stsepankou D; Vengrinovich V; Hesser J; M Svahn T
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190345. PubMed ID: 31453718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
Polat A; Yildirim I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Influence of Image Reconstruction Method on Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
Nishikawa M; Tominaga K; Ueno T; Yasukawa S; Hiroshige K; Mouri K; Kozawa Y; Uemura T; Fujimitsu R; Yoshimitsu K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 33473075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving image quality for digital breast tomosynthesis: an automated detection and diffusion-based method for metal artifact reduction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7765-7783. PubMed ID: 28832336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.
Zeng R; Badano A; Myers KJ
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2598-2611. PubMed ID: 28151728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast enhanced breast CT compared to digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography.
Aminololama-Shakeri S; Abbey CK; López JE; Hernandez AM; Gazi P; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
Br J Radiol; 2019 May; 92(1097):20181034. PubMed ID: 30810339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-attenuation artifact reduction in breast tomosynthesis using a novel reconstruction algorithm.
Dustler M; Wicklein J; Förnvik H; Boita J; Bakic P; Lång K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():21-26. PubMed ID: 31153567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
