140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31453760)
1. Speech polar plots for different directionality settings of SONNET cochlear implant processor.
De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Nopp P; Péan V; J Govaerts P
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):299-311. PubMed ID: 31453760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems.
Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Dietz A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 32160829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech Intelligibility in Noise With a Pinna Effect Imitating Cochlear Implant Processor.
Wimmer W; Weder S; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 26427637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microphone directionality and wind noise reduction enhance speech perception in users of the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
Hagen R; Radeloff A; Stark T; Anderson I; Nopp P; Aschbacher E; Möltner A; Khajehnouri Y; Rak K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 31524107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech perception in noise and sound localization using different microphone modes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant users.
Müller V; Krause J; Klünter HD; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 May; 156():111117. PubMed ID: 35366421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.
Dwyer RT; Roberts J; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):578-589. PubMed ID: 32340055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness.
Kurz A; Zanzinger M; Hagen R; Rak K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jun; 278(6):2067-2077. PubMed ID: 33141254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise With an Off the Ear CI Processor Enabling Adaptive Microphone Directionality.
Wesarg T; Voss B; Hassepass F; Beck R; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Arndt S
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):e240-e249. PubMed ID: 29533332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor.
De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Vanpoucke F; Govaerts PJ
Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Microphone Configuration on Speech Perception of Cochlear Implant Users in Traffic Noise.
Weissgerber T; Bandeira M; Brendel M; Stöver T; Baumann U
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e198-e205. PubMed ID: 30741896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.
De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
