These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31453946)

  • 1. Validity and Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Cycle Ergometer for the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Lunn WR; Axtell RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 31453946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of the velotron racermate cycle ergometer to measure anaerobic power.
    Astorino TA; Cottrell T
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 33(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 22187386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of physiological measures obtained using the Lode Excalibur Sport cycle ergometer and Tacx i-Magic home training device.
    Merry KL
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2018 May; 58(5):563-569. PubMed ID: 28462577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Ergometer and applicability to Computrainer electromagnetically braked cycling training device.
    Earnest CP; Wharton RP; Church TS; Lucia A
    J Strength Cond Res; 2005 May; 19(2):344-8. PubMed ID: 15903373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Reliability and Validity of the PowerTap P1 Power Pedals Before and After 100 Hours of Use.
    Wright J; Walker T; Burnet S; Jobson SA
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Jul; 14(6):855–858. PubMed ID: 30569791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and Validity of a New Portable Tethered Sprint Running Test as a Measure of Maximal Anaerobic Performance.
    Limmer M; Berkholz A; de Marées M; Platen P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Aug; 34(8):2197-2204. PubMed ID: 30946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of Velotron chainring size on Wingate anaerobic test.
    Clark NW; Wagner DR; Heath EM
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Feb; 21(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 28807684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and Reliability of the Stages Cycling Power Meter.
    Granier C; Hausswirth C; Dorel S; Le Meur Y
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Dec; 34(12):3554-3559. PubMed ID: 28902109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lower Wingate Test Power Outcomes From "All-Out" Pretest Pedaling Cadence Compared With Moderate Cadence.
    Lunn WR; Zenoni MA; Crandall IH; Dress AE; Berglund ML
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2367-73. PubMed ID: 26200017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wingate Anaerobic Test Reliability on the Velotron With Ice Hockey Players.
    Bringhurst RF; Wagner DR; Schwartz S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1716-1722. PubMed ID: 29385006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of anaerobic capacity in rowers using Wingate test on cycle and rowing ergometer.
    Klasnja A; Barak O; Popadić-Gaćesa J; Drapsin M; Knezević A; Grujić N
    Med Pregl; 2010; 63(9-10):620-3. PubMed ID: 21443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The validity and reliability of a sample of 10 Wattbike cycle ergometers.
    Wainwright B; Cooke CB; O'Hara JP
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Jul; 35(14):1451-1458. PubMed ID: 27552233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity and reliability of the Ergomopro powermeter.
    Kirkland A; Coleman D; Wiles JD; Hopker J
    Int J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 29(11):913-6. PubMed ID: 18512176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wingate Anaerobic Test Percentile Norms in Colombian Healthy Adults.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; López-Albán CA; La Rotta-Villamizar DR; Romero-García JA; Alonso-Martinez AM; Izquierdo M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jan; 30(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 26691412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute effects of static stretching on Wingate testing in men.
    Miller JM
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2020 Jul; 60(7):974-978. PubMed ID: 32597614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Micklewright D; Alkhatib A; Beneke R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Apr; 96(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 16468058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship of high intensity cycle ergometry.
    McNaughton L; Thomas D
    Int J Sports Med; 1996 May; 17(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8814511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of 11- to 16-year-olds' short-term power output determined using both treadmill running and cycle ergometry.
    Armstrong N; Welsman J; Bloxham S
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2019 Jul; 119(7):1565-1580. PubMed ID: 31028467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allometric scaling of Wingate anaerobic power test scores in men.
    Stickley CD; Hetzler RK; Wages JJ; Freemyer BG; Kimura IF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Sep; 27(9):2603-11. PubMed ID: 23364295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.