These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31453946)

  • 21. A comparison of two anaerobic test measurement systems using an upper body Wingate test.
    Talbot C; Kay TD; Walker N; Price MJ
    Res Sports Med; 2014; 22(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 24950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of the arm-cranking 30-second Wingate Anaerobic Test (the WAnT) to assess power in amputee football players.
    Nowak AM; Molik B; Kosmol A; Szczepaniak M; Marszałek J
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2021; 23(3):13-23. PubMed ID: 34978315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accurate assessment of work done and power during a Wingate anaerobic test.
    Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Baker JS; Davies B
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Apr; 32(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 17486163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correcting the Wingate test for changes in kinetic energy of the ergometer flywheel.
    Bassett DR
    Int J Sports Med; 1989 Dec; 10(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 2628365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity and reliability of the single-trial line drill test of anaerobic power in basketball players.
    Fatouros IG; Laparidis K; Kambas A; Chatzinikolaou A; Techlikidou E; Katrabasas I; Douroudos I; Leontsini D; Berberidou F; Draganidis D; Christoforidis C; Tsoukas D; Kelis S; Taxildaris K
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2011 Mar; 51(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 21297561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of the Woodway Curve(TM) Non-Motorized Treadmill for Assessing Anaerobic Performance.
    Gonzalez AM; Wells AJ; Hoffman JR; Stout JR; Fragala MS; Mangine GT; McCormack WP; Townsend JR; Jajtner AR; Emerson NS; Robinson Iv EH
    J Sports Sci Med; 2013; 12(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 24149732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determining the variability of performance on Wingate anaerobic tests in children aged 6-12 years.
    Naughton G; Carlson J; Fairweather I
    Int J Sports Med; 1992 Oct; 13(7):512-7. PubMed ID: 1459745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maximal power outputs during the Wingate anaerobic test.
    Patton JF; Murphy MM; Frederick FA
    Int J Sports Med; 1985 Apr; 6(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 4008145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anaerobic Threshold Determination in Cycle Ergometer From Rating of Perceived Exertion.
    Santos GAD; Numata-Filho ES; Rosa TDS; Passos Neves RV; Simões HG; Moreira SR
    J Strength Cond Res; 2022 May; 36(5):1277-1281. PubMed ID: 32412967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validity and Reliability of the Cycleops Hammer Cycle Ergometer.
    Lillo-Bevia JR; Pallarés JG
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2018 Aug; 13(7):853-859. PubMed ID: 29182415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of trunk angle on power production in cycling.
    Too D
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1994 Dec; 65(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 7886279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of load on wingate test performances and reliability.
    Jaafar H; Rouis M; Coudrat L; Attiogbé E; Vandewalle H; Driss T
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3462-8. PubMed ID: 24936901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability of arm Wingate Anaerobic Testing in persons with complete paraplegia.
    Jacobs PL; Mahoney ET; Johnson B
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2003; 26(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 12828291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the Wingate and Bosco anaerobic tests.
    Sands WA; McNeal JR; Ochi MT; Urbanek TL; Jemni M; Stone MH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Nov; 18(4):810-5. PubMed ID: 15574087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inertial effects on mechanically braked Wingate power calculations.
    Reiser RF; Broker JP; Peterson ML
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9):1660-4. PubMed ID: 10994921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of the Wingate anaerobic mechanical power outputs from a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary exercise stress test using machine-learning approach.
    Leopold E; Navot-Mintzer D; Shargal E; Tsuk S; Tuller T; Scheinowitz M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212199. PubMed ID: 30861009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Anaerobic Power Assessment in CrossFit
    Ponce-García T; Benítez-Porres J; García-Romero JC; Castillo-Domínguez A; Alvero-Cruz JR
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of treadmill and cycle ergometer measurements of force-velocity relationships and power output.
    Jaskólska A; Goossens P; Veenstra B; Jaskólski A; Skinner JS
    Int J Sports Med; 1999 Apr; 20(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 10333097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physiologic and perceptual responses to exercise on a new cycle ergometer.
    Attaway R; Bartoli WP; Pate RR; Davis JM
    Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Mar; 17(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 1322770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of a 3-min all-out Arm Crank Ergometer Exercise Test.
    Flueck JL; Lienert M; Schaufelberger F; Perret C
    Int J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 36(10):809-13. PubMed ID: 26038881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.