157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31454088)
1. Oral processing of hydrogels: Influence of food material properties versus individuals' eating capability.
Krop EM; Hetherington MM; Miquel S; Sarkar A
J Texture Stud; 2020 Feb; 51(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 31454088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age, gender, ethnicity and eating capability influence oral processing behaviour of liquid, semi-solid and solid foods differently.
Ketel EC; Aguayo-Mendoza MG; de Wijk RA; de Graaf C; Piqueras-Fiszman B; Stieger M
Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():143-151. PubMed ID: 30884642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How addition of peach gel particles to yogurt affects oral behavior, sensory perception and liking of consumers differing in age.
Aguayo-Mendoza M; Santagiuliana M; Ong X; Piqueras-Fiszman B; Scholten E; Stieger M
Food Res Int; 2020 Aug; 134():109213. PubMed ID: 32517909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation.
Forde CG; van Kuijk N; Thaler T; de Graaf C; Martin N
Appetite; 2013 Jan; 60(1):208-219. PubMed ID: 23017464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oral processing behaviours of liquid, solid and composite foods are primarily driven by texture, mechanical and lubrication properties rather than by taste intensity.
Gonzalez-Estanol K; Libardi M; Biasioli F; Stieger M
Food Funct; 2022 May; 13(9):5011-5022. PubMed ID: 35438704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the lubrication behavior of whey protein model foods using tribology in linear and elliptical movement.
Campbell CL; Foegeding EA; van de Velde F
J Texture Stud; 2017 Aug; 48(4):335-341. PubMed ID: 28556911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in food bolus texture during mastication.
Wada S; Goto T; Fujimoto K; Watanabe M; Nagao K; Nakamichi A; Ichikawa T
J Texture Stud; 2017 Apr; 48(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 28370114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of oral processing, food perception and social aspects on food consumption: a review.
Pereira LJ; van der Bilt A
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 43(8):630-48. PubMed ID: 27061099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of instrumental texture properties from textural profile analysis (TPA) with eating behaviours and macronutrient composition for a wide range of solid foods.
Wee MSM; Goh AT; Stieger M; Forde CG
Food Funct; 2018 Oct; 9(10):5301-5312. PubMed ID: 30256358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relating oral physiology and anatomy of consumers varying in age, gender and ethnicity to food oral processing behavior.
Ketel EC; de Wijk RA; de Graaf C; Stieger M
Physiol Behav; 2020 Mar; 215():112766. PubMed ID: 31812520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of oral processing on appetite and food intake - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Krop EM; Hetherington MM; Nekitsing C; Miquel S; Postelnicu L; Sarkar A
Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():253-269. PubMed ID: 29408331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the Miniature Kramer Shear Cell to Measure Both Solid Food and Bolus Mechanical Properties and Their Interplay with Oral Processing Behavior.
Álvarez MD; Paniagua J; Herranz B
Foods; 2020 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 32403223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sauce it up: influence of condiment properties on oral processing behavior, bolus formation and sensory perception of solid foods.
van Eck A; Franks E; Vinyard CJ; Galindo-Cuspinera V; Fogliano V; Stieger M; Scholten E
Food Funct; 2020 Jul; 11(7):6186-6201. PubMed ID: 32578647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of and relationships between oral physiology, anatomy and food oral processing behavior of Chinese (Asian) and Dutch (Caucasian) consumers differing in age.
Ketel EC; Zhang Y; Jia J; Wang X; de Wijk RA; Chen J; Stieger M
Physiol Behav; 2021 Apr; 232():113284. PubMed ID: 33309703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In situ oral lubrication and smoothness sensory perception influenced by tongue surface roughness.
Wang X; Chen J; Wang X
J Sci Food Agric; 2022 Jan; 102(1):132-138. PubMed ID: 34057739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A quantitative assessment of the eating capability in the elderly individuals.
Laguna L; Sarkar A; Artigas G; Chen J
Physiol Behav; 2015 Aug; 147():274-81. PubMed ID: 25936821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectral analysis of the stick-slip phenomenon in "oral" tribological texture evaluation.
Sanahuja S; Upadhyay R; Briesen H; Chen J
J Texture Stud; 2017 Aug; 48(4):318-334. PubMed ID: 28419471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast or slow-foods? Describing natural variations in oral processing characteristics across a wide range of Asian foods.
Forde CG; Leong C; Chia-Ming E; McCrickerd K
Food Funct; 2017 Feb; 8(2):595-606. PubMed ID: 27883158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of oro-sensory exposure duration and intensity manipulations on satiation.
Lasschuijt MP; Mars M; Stieger M; Miquel-Kergoat S; de Graaf C; Smeets P
Physiol Behav; 2017 Jul; 176():76-83. PubMed ID: 28174138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can we understand food oral processing using Kano model? Case study with confectionery products.
Djekic I; Ilic J; Guiné RPF; Tomasevic I
J Texture Stud; 2020 Dec; 51(6):861-869. PubMed ID: 32654141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
