These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31454169)

  • 1. Regulatory Focus and the Effect of Nutritional Messages on Health and Well-Being: The Case of Red Meat Intake.
    Bertolotti M; Carfora V; Catellani P
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2020 Mar; 12(1):212-230. PubMed ID: 31454169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different Frames to Reduce Red Meat Intake: The Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy.
    Bertolotti M; Carfora V; Catellani P
    Health Commun; 2020 Apr; 35(4):475-482. PubMed ID: 30676108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Promoting change in meat consumption among the elderly: Factual and prefactual framing of health and well-being.
    Bertolotti M; Chirchiglia G; Catellani P
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():37-47. PubMed ID: 26924560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How effective are messages and their characteristics in changing behavioural intentions to substitute plant-based foods for red meat? The mediating role of prior beliefs.
    Vainio A; Irz X; Hartikainen H
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():217-224. PubMed ID: 29447995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Cognitive-Emotional Model to Explain Message Framing Effects: Reducing Meat Consumption.
    Carfora V; Pastore M; Catellani P
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():583209. PubMed ID: 33854457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health or environment? Understanding which informative message is more effective in replacing red meat with mushroom-based alternatives.
    De Cianni R; Mancuso T; Rizzo G; Migliore G
    Appetite; 2024 Aug; 199():107405. PubMed ID: 38723668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing health and environmental warning messages about red meat: An online experiment.
    Taillie LS; Prestemon CE; Hall MG; Grummon AH; Vesely A; Jaacks LM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0268121. PubMed ID: 35749387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Framing and Tailoring Prefactual Messages to Reduce Red Meat Consumption: Predicting Effects Through a Psychology-Based Graphical Causal Model.
    Catellani P; Carfora V; Piastra M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():825602. PubMed ID: 35222207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulatory fit messages and physical activity motivation.
    Pfeffer I
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2013 Apr; 35(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 23535971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informational and emotional daily messages to reduce red and processed meat consumption.
    Carfora V; Bertolotti M; Catellani P
    Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104331. PubMed ID: 31276710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of narrative and message framing on engagement and eating intention among a sample of adult Hispanics.
    Wirtz JG; Kulpavaropas S
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2014; 46(5):396-400. PubMed ID: 24517968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emphasizing the losses or the gains: Comparing situational and individual moderators of framed messages to promote fruit and vegetable intake.
    Godinho CA; Alvarez MJ; Lima ML
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():416-425. PubMed ID: 26455312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review.
    Gallagher KM; Updegraff JA
    Ann Behav Med; 2012 Feb; 43(1):101-16. PubMed ID: 21993844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses to persuasive messages encouraging professional help seeking for depression: comparison between individuals with and without psychological distress.
    Suka M; Yamauchi T; Yanagisawa H
    Environ Health Prev Med; 2019 May; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 31068125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomised controlled trial of a text messaging intervention for reducing processed meat consumption: The mediating roles of anticipated regret and intention.
    Carfora V; Caso D; Conner M
    Appetite; 2017 Oct; 117():152-160. PubMed ID: 28651971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived Message Effectiveness of the Meatless Monday Campaign: An Experiment With US Adults.
    Rayala HT; Rebolledo N; Hall MG; Taillie LS
    Am J Public Health; 2022 May; 112(5):724-727. PubMed ID: 35324262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Health, Environmental, and Animal Welfare Messages Discouraging Red Meat Consumption: An Online Randomized Experiment.
    Grummon AH; Musicus AA; Salvia MG; Thorndike AN; Rimm EB
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2023 Mar; 123(3):466-476.e26. PubMed ID: 36223865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequencing the threat and recommendation components of persuasive messages differentially improves the effectiveness of high- and low-distressing imagery in an anti-alcohol message in students.
    Brown SL; West C
    Br J Health Psychol; 2015 May; 20(2):324-40. PubMed ID: 24754526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlational study and randomised controlled trial for understanding and changing red meat consumption: The role of eating identities.
    Carfora V; Caso D; Conner M
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Feb; 175():244-252. PubMed ID: 28129949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the effects of a message on attitude and intention to eat raw meat: Salmonellosis prevention.
    Trifiletti E; Crovato S; Capozza D; Visintin EP; Ravarotto L
    J Food Prot; 2012 Feb; 75(2):394-9. PubMed ID: 22289604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.