These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31454353)

  • 1. On the use of in-silico simulations to support experimental design: A case study in microbial inactivation of foods.
    Garre A; Peñalver-Soto JL; Esnoz A; Iguaz A; Fernandez PS; Egea JA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220683. PubMed ID: 31454353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for the design of (optimal) isothermal inactivation experiments.
    Peñalver-Soto JL; Garre A; Esnoz A; Fernández PS; Egea JA
    Food Res Int; 2019 Dec; 126():108714. PubMed ID: 31732079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introducing optimal experimental design in predictive modeling: a motivating example.
    Versyck KJ; Bernaerts K; Geeraerd AH; Van Impe JF
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1999 Oct; 51(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 10563462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal experimental design (OED) for the growth rate of microbial populations. Are they really more "optimal" than uniform designs?
    Guillén S; Possas A; Valero A; Garre A
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 413():110604. PubMed ID: 38310711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive microbiology models vs. modeling microbial growth within Listeria monocytogenes risk assessment: what parameters matter and why.
    Pouillot R; Lubran MB
    Food Microbiol; 2011 Jun; 28(4):720-6. PubMed ID: 21511132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An educationally inspired illustration of two-dimensional Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) and sensitivity analysis.
    Vásquez GA; Busschaert P; Haberbeck LU; Uyttendaele M; Geeraerd AH
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Nov; 190():31-43. PubMed ID: 25173917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tail or artefact? Illustration of the impact that uncertainty of the serial dilution and cell enumeration methods has on microbial inactivation.
    Garre A; Egea JA; Esnoz A; Palop A; Fernandez PS
    Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():76-83. PubMed ID: 30884713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo Simulations for the Analysis of Non-linear Parameter Confidence Intervals in Optimal Experimental Design.
    Krausch N; Barz T; Sawatzki A; Gruber M; Kamel S; Neubauer P; Cruz Bournazou MN
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():122. PubMed ID: 31179278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stochastic modeling of variability in survival behavior of Bacillus simplex spore population during isothermal inactivation at the single cell level using a Monte Carlo simulation.
    Abe H; Koyama K; Kawamura S; Koseki S
    Food Microbiol; 2019 Sep; 82():436-444. PubMed ID: 31027803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mathematical modelling of the stress resistance induced in Listeria monocytogenes during dynamic, mild heat treatments.
    Garre A; González-Tejedor GA; Aznar A; Fernández PS; Egea JA
    Food Microbiol; 2019 Dec; 84():103238. PubMed ID: 31421752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of microstructure and initial cell conditions on thermal inactivation kinetics and sublethal injury of Listeria monocytogenes in fish-based food model systems.
    Verheyen D; Baka M; Akkermans S; Skåra T; Van Impe JF
    Food Microbiol; 2019 Dec; 84():103267. PubMed ID: 31421789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal experiment design for cardinal values estimation: guidelines for data collection.
    Bernaerts K; Gysemans KP; Nhan Minh T; Van Impe JF
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 100(1-3):153-65. PubMed ID: 15854701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical comparison of statistical methods for quantifying variability and uncertainty of microbial responses from experimental data.
    Garre A; Pielaat A; Zwietering MH; den Besten HMW; Smid JH
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2022 Dec; 383():109935. PubMed ID: 36183424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal experimental design for discriminating between microbial growth models as function of suboptimal temperature.
    Stamati I; Logist F; Van Derlinden E; Gauchi JP; Van Impe J
    Math Biosci; 2014 Apr; 250():69-80. PubMed ID: 24480738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef hamburgers.
    Cassin MH; Lammerding AM; Todd EC; Ross W; McColl RS
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1998 May; 41(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 9631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of results of microbiological analyses for risk-based control of Listeria monocytogenes in marinated broiler legs.
    Aarnisalo K; Vihavainen E; Rantala L; Maijala R; Suihko ML; Hielm S; Tuominen P; Ranta J; Raaska L
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 121(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 18155311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Added value of experts' knowledge to improve a quantitative microbial exposure assessment model--Application to aseptic-UHT food products.
    Pujol L; Johnson NB; Magras C; Albert I; Membré JM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 211():6-17. PubMed ID: 26143288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
    Miconnet N; Cornu M; Beaufort A; Rosso L; Denis JB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.