These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31455147)

  • 1. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
    Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
    Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
    Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
    Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
    An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
    Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
    Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment.
    Kliemann LM; Silva M; Reinheimer M; Rivoire WA; Capp E; Dos Reis R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):342-6. PubMed ID: 22948133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
    Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
    Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
    Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
    Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
    Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability.
    Matsumura M; Ota T; Takeshima N; Takizawa K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reevaluation of negative cervical conizations: Frequency, diagnostic errors, risk factors and management.
    Lorenset LC; Percicote AP; Munhos SHO; Zanine RM
    Pathol Res Pract; 2024 May; 257():155283. PubMed ID: 38614053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.
    Montanari E; Grimm C; Schwameis R; Kuessel L; Polterauer S; Paternostro C; Husslein H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 29602979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prognostic factors of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions treated by cold knife conization with negative margin].
    Meng QW; Qin ZH; Mao Y; Zhao XD
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 42(7):457-9. PubMed ID: 17961334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Value of endocervical margin and high-risk human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Kong TW; Son JH; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Ryu HS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25284039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of high-grade residual disease after repeat conization in patients with positive surgical margins.
    Minareci Y; Ak N; Tosun OA; Sozen H; Disci R; Topuz S; Salihoglu MY
    Ginekol Pol; 2022; 93(12):962-967. PubMed ID: 35894500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Andersen ES; Pedersen B; Nielsen K
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8063246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
    Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.