These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31455709)

  • 1. Introduction and adoption of innovative invasive procedures and devices in the NHS: an in-depth analysis of written policies and qualitative interviews (the INTRODUCE study protocol).
    Cousins S; Richards H; Zahra J; Elliott D; Avery K; Robertson HF; Paramasivan S; Wilson N; Mathews J; Tolkien Z; Main BG; Blencowe NS; Hinchliffe R; Blazeby JM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e029963. PubMed ID: 31455709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Qualitative documentary analysis of guidance on information provision and consent for the introduction of innovative invasive procedures including surgeries within NHS organisations' policies in England and Wales.
    Ochieng CA; Richards H; Zahra J; Cousins S; Elliott D; Wilson N; Paramasivan S; Avery KNL; Mathews J; Main BG; Hinchliffe R; Blencowe NS; Blazeby JM
    BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e059228. PubMed ID: 36581966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Healthcare organization policy recommendations for the governance of surgical innovation: review of NHS policies.
    Cousins S; Richards HS; Zahra J; Robertson H; Mathews JA; Avery KNL; Elliott D; Blencowe NS; Main B; Hinchliffe R; Clarke A; Blazeby J
    Br J Surg; 2022 Sep; 109(10):1004-1012. PubMed ID: 36084337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using qualitative research methods to understand how surgical procedures and devices are introduced into NHS hospitals: the Lotus study protocol.
    Elliott D; Blencowe NS; Cousins S; Zahra J; Skilton A; Mathews J; Paramasivan S; Hoffmann C; McNair AG; Ochieng C; Richards H; Hossaini S; Scroggie DL; Main B; Potter S; Avery K; Donovan J; Blazeby JM
    BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e049234. PubMed ID: 34862280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study).
    Avery K; Blazeby J; Wilson N; Macefield R; Cousins S; Main B; Blencowe NS; Zahra J; Elliott D; Hinchliffe R; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e029574. PubMed ID: 31515426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of surgeons' and governance representatives' views.
    Zahra J; Paramasivan S; Blencowe NS; Cousins S; Avery K; Mathews J; Main BG; McNair AGK; Hinchliffe R; Blazeby JM; Elliott D
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e035251. PubMed ID: 33158818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
    Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
    Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. REducing unwarranted variation in the Delivery of high qUality hip fraCture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study.
    Patel R; Drew S; Johansen A; Chesser T; Javaid MK; Griffin XL; Jones T; Griffin J; Bradshaw M; Whale K; Barbosa EC; Marques EMR; Ben-Shlomo Y; Gooberman-Hill R; Judge A; Gregson CL
    BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e049763. PubMed ID: 34011603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adoption of routine surgical video recording: a nationwide freedom of information act request across England and Wales.
    Yiu A; Lam K; Simister C; Clarke J; Kinross J
    EClinicalMedicine; 2024 Apr; 70():102545. PubMed ID: 38685926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the views of female genital mutilation survivors, their male partners and healthcare professionals on the timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS FGM care provision (the FGM Sister Study): protocol for a qualitative study.
    Jones L; Danks E; Clarke J; Alidu L; Costello B; Jolly K; Byrne A; Fassam-Wright M; Latthe P; Taylor J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e034140. PubMed ID: 31628134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mixed Methods EvAluation of the high-volume low-complexity Surgical hUb pRogrammE (MEASURE): a mixed methods study protocol.
    Scantlebury A; Sivey P; Anteneh Z; Ayres B; Bloor K; Castelli A; Castro-Avila AC; Davies F; Davies S; Glerum-Brooks K; Gutacker N; Lampard P; Rangan A; Saad A; Street A; Wen J; Adamson J
    BMJ Open; 2024 Apr; 14(4):e086338. PubMed ID: 38643003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research protocol for the validation of a new portable technology for real-time continuous monitoring of Early Warning Score (EWS) in hospital practice and for an early-stage multistakeholder assessment.
    Manetti S; Vainieri M; Guidotti E; Zuccarino S; Ferré F; Morelli MS; Emdin M
    BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e040738. PubMed ID: 33273048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why do patients with stroke not receive the recommended amount of active therapy (ReAcT)? Study protocol for a multisite case study investigation.
    Clarke DJ; Tyson S; Rodgers H; Drummond A; Palmer R; Prescott M; Tyrrell P; Burton L; Grenfell K; Brkic L; Forster A
    BMJ Open; 2015 Aug; 5(8):e008443. PubMed ID: 26307617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcomE followIng major lower limb amputation: a collaboratiVE study (PERCEIVE)-protocol for the PERCEIVE qualitative study.
    Milosevic S; Brookes-Howell L; Gwilym BL; Waldron CA; Thomas-Jones E; Preece R; Pallmann P; Harris D; Massey I; Stewart P; Samuel K; Jones S; Cox D; Twine CP; Edwards A; Bosanquet DC
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e053159. PubMed ID: 35039292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
    Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF
    Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How effective and cost-effective are innovative combinatorial technologies and practices for supporting older people with long-term conditions to remain well in the community? An evaluation protocol for an NHS Test Bed in North West England.
    Varey S; Hernández A; Palmer TM; Mateus C; Wilkinson J; Dixon M; Milligan C
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e017268. PubMed ID: 29490952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol.
    Wagstaff D; Moonesinghe SR; Fulop NJ; Vindrola-Padros C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e030214. PubMed ID: 31296515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NHS mental health services' policies on leave for detained patients in England and Wales: A national audit.
    Barlow EM; Dickens GL
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2023 Aug; 30(4):719-730. PubMed ID: 36648380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What might make nurses stay? A protocol for discrete choice experiments to understand NHS nurses' preferences at early-career and late-career stages.
    Ejebu OZ; Turnbull J; Atherton I; Rafferty AM; Palmer B; Philippou J; Prichard J; Jamieson M; Rolewicz L; Williams M; Ball J
    BMJ Open; 2024 Feb; 14(2):e075066. PubMed ID: 38307538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Novel Mixed-Methods Platform Study Protocol for Investigating New Surgical Devices, with Embedded Shared Learning: Ibra-net Breast Lesion Localisation Study.
    Bromley HL; Dave R; Holcombe C; Potter S; Maxwell AJ; Kirwan C; Mylvaganam S; Elgammal S; Morgan J; Down S; Masudi T; Sami A; Barnes N; Harvey J
    Int J Surg Protoc; 2021 Apr; 25(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 34013142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.